SubjectsSubjects(version: 945)
Course, academic year 2023/2024
   Login via CAS
Environmental Sociology - ASGV00466E
Title: Environmental Sociology
Guaranteed by: International Office (21-ZO)
Faculty: Faculty of Arts
Actual: from 2021
Semester: summer
Points: 0
E-Credits: 5
Examination process: summer s.:
Hours per week, examination: summer s.:2/0, Ex [HT]
Capacity: unknown / unknown (unknown)
Min. number of students: unlimited
4EU+: no
Virtual mobility / capacity: no
Key competences:  
State of the course: taught
Language: English
Teaching methods: full-time
Teaching methods: full-time
Level:  
Is provided by: ASGV00466
Note: course can be enrolled in outside the study plan
enabled for web enrollment
Guarantor: Mgr. Iva Zvěřinová, Ph.D.
Class: Exchange - 14.2 Sociology
Annotation -
Last update: Mgr. Iva Zvěřinová, Ph.D. (08.02.2024)
Environmental sociology searches for answers to questions related to the interconnectedness of the natural environment and society. In late modern society, environmental issues have substantial (and existential) importance and environmental sociology quickly has become an established and rapidly evolving discipline with an important interdisciplinary role. This course is an introduction to environmental sociology and the issues the discipline investigates and discusses. Given the aims of the course and the discipline, students are encouraged to participate in the selection of topics covered in classes according to their personal and/or professional interests.

Study materials will be available on Moodle (https://dl1.cuni.cz/enrol/index.php?id=777).
Exam: presentations, tests
The lectures take place at Charles University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Sociology, Celetná 13, Praha 1, room 1.09.
Aim of the course
Last update: Mgr. Iva Zvěřinová, Ph.D. (02.03.2020)

Course aims:

  • To develop critical thinking and analysis of environmental problems as social problems.
  • To introduce environmental sociology as an independent sociological discipline and the main topics and issues investigated.
  • To develop analytical skills through analysis of a chosen topic.
  • To develop presentation skills through preparation and presentation of an academic poster.

Course completion requirements
Last update: Mgr. Iva Zvěřinová, Ph.D. (20.02.2024)

The grade is based on points. Each activity is awarded a certain amount of points. The grade is derived from the overall amount of points as follows: 1) own research (you can choose among the literature review, quantitative survey, secondary data analysis, qualitative survey) (in total 20 points); 2) presentation of results of the research either in the form of an academic poster or PowerPoint presentation (15 points); 3) class attendance (1 point per one class); 4) first test (maximum of 30 points); 5) second test (maximum of 35 points). The tests will be based on lectures and reading assignments. The tests will consist of open-ended questions. 

The number of points and related grade are summarized in this table:

96-100

A (1)

91-95

B (1)

86-90

C (2)

81-85

D (2)

70-80

E (3)

69 and less

F

Academic poster work due dates:

5. 3. short presentation of teams and topics of team-work
  2. 4. short presentation of the first version of the posters and discussion (5 points)
16. 4. submission of the revised version of the posters (5 points)
  7. 5.  / 28. 5. submission of the final version of the posters (10 points)
  7. 5.  / 28. 5. presentation of the final version of the posters (15 points)

Tests:

26.3. first test
28.5. second test

Additional test dates:

11. 6.; 18. 6. 

Literature
Last update: Mgr. Iva Zvěřinová, Ph.D. (02.03.2020)

Invitation to environmental sociology

Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

King, L., & McCarthy, D. (Eds.). (2009). Environmental Sociology: From Analysis to Action. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Mayerfeld Bell, M. (2008). An Invitation to Environmental Sociology (Sociology for a New Century.). London: Pine Forge Press.

Redclift, M. R., & Woodgate, G. (Eds.). (2005). New Developments in Environmental Sociology (An Elgar Reference Collection.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

White, R. (Ed.). (2004). Controversies in Environmental Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buttel, F.H. 2005. "Classical Theory and Contemporary Environmental Sociology: some reflections on antecendents and prospects for reflexive modernization theories in the study of environment and society." In M.R. Redclift, G. Woodgate: New Developments in Environmental Sociology, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.

Dunlap, R.E. (2002). Environmental Sociology: A Personal Perspective on Its First Quarter Century. Organization Environment, 15, 10-29.

Lidskog, R. (2001). The Re-Naturalization of Society? Environmental Challenges for Sociology. Current Sociology 49(1), 113-136.

 

Interaction between current societies and environment: The New Environmental Paradigm; the Treadmill of Production; Ecological Modernization Theory

Buttel, H. B. (2004, September). The Treadmill of Production: An Apprecitation, Assessment, and Agenda for Research. Organization and Environment, 17(3), 323.

Catton, W. J., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental Paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13, 41–49.

Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1).

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

York, R., & Rosa, E. A. (2003). Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory: Institutional Efficacy, Case Study Evidence, Units of Analysis, and the Pace of Eco-Efficiency. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 273-288. doi:10.1177/1086026603256299

 

Climate change: solutions and public responses

Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240

Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Steg, L., Böhm, G., & Fisher, S. (2019, March). Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change, 55, 25–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007

de Coninck, H., A. Revi, M. Babiker, P. Bertoldi, M. Buckeridge, A. Cartwright, W. Dong, J. Ford, S. Fuss, J.-C. Hourcade, D. Ley, R. Mechler, P. Newman, A. Revokatova, S. Schultz, L. Steg, and T. Sugiyama, 2018: Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [MassonDelmotte,V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_Chapter4_Low_Res.pdf

 

A social history of the environment

Goudie, A. (2013). The Human Impact on the Natural Environment: Past, Present and Future (7th ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/cuni/Doc?id=10684948

Whyte, I. (2013). A Dictionary of Environmental History. London: I.B. Tauris. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/cuni/Doc?id=10773026

Hughes, J. (2001). An Environmental History of the World: Humankind’s Changing Role in the Community of Life. London: Taylor & Francis.

 

A social history of energy transitions

O’connor, P. A. (2010, December). Energy Transitions. The Pardee Papers. Boston University. https://www.bu.edu/pardee/files/2010/11/12-PP-Nov2010.pdf

Smill, V. (2010). Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects. Santa-Barbara: Preager. (Chapter 2)

Kander, A., Malanima, P., & Warde, P. (2008, December). Energy transitions in Europe: 1600-2000. Papers in Innovation Studies 2008/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy. http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/200812_Kander_et_al.pdf

 

Risk and society

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.

(in Czech: Beck, U. 2004. Riziková společnost: Na cestě k jiné moderně. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.)

Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30, 827-840.

Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk.  London: Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.

Taylor-Gooby, P., Zinn, J. O. (2006). Risk in Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wilkinson, I. (2001). Social Theories of Risk Perception: At Once Indispensable and Insufficient. Current Sociology, 49 (1), 1-22.

 

Environmental justice and inequalities

Whitelaw, Diana & Visgioio, Gerald. (2003). Our Backyard: A Quest for Environmental Justice. Rowman & Littlefield.

Maantay, J., & McLafferty, S. (2011). Geospatial analysis of environmental health. New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

 

Environmentally significant behaviour: Do attitudes influence behaviour? If yes, how?

Ajzen, I. (2008). Consumer attitudes and behavior. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr & F. R. Cardes (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 525- 548). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network, January 2005. Guildford Surrey: University of Surrey, Centre for Environmental Strategy.

Spaargaren, G. (2003). Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy Perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 16(8), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309192

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009, September). Encouraging pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 409–411.

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review, 6(2), 81-97.

 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html