|
|
|
||
Last update: doc. PhDr. Kateřina Svatoňová, Ph.D. (01.02.2024)
|
|
||
Last update: doc. PhDr. Kateřina Svatoňová, Ph.D. (01.02.2024)
Bendazzi, Giannalberto. 2004. Defining Animation – A Proposal. Cópia datil.
-------. 2015. Animation – A World History. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wells, Paul. 1998. Understanding Animation. London and New York: Routledge.
Buchan, Suzanne (ed.). 2013. Pervasive Animation. London and New York: Routledge.
Ülo Pikkov. 2017. On the Links between Caricatures and Animated Films in Communist Eastern Europe. Baltic Screen Media Review 5.
-------. 2013. Surrealist Sources of Eastern European Animation Film. Baltic Screen Media Review 1.
Wood, Aylish. 2006. Re-animating space. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1(2), 133–152. Whybray, Adam. 2020. The Art of Czech Animation: A History of Political Dissent and Allegory. London: Bloomsbury. Pike, Deidre M. 2010. Enviro-toons: How animated media communicate environmental themes [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada]. University of Nevada, Reno ScholarWorks. https://scholarworks.unr.edu/handle/11714/4317.
Csicsery-Ronay Jr., Istvan. 2015. “What is Estranged in Science Fiction Animation?” In Simultaneous Worlds: Global Science Fiction Cinema edited by Jennifer L. Feeley and Sarah Ann Wells. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 29-46.
Ward, Paul. 2003. The Place of Animation within Film and Media Studies: a theoretical and pedagogic approach. Dissertation. University of London. |
|
||
Last update: doc. PhDr. Kateřina Svatoňová, Ph.D. (01.02.2024)
Course Requirements Students will be required to:
intellectual curiosity
The goal is to lead a productive dialogue about the film and the relevant historical context, progressing toward a deeper understanding of it. This can be done through a handout with questions to be addressed in class; through screening short clips of the film and offering them for discussion; or any other method you find effective. The main measure of success (and basis for evaluation) will be the leader’s ability to engage others and sustain an ongoing intellectual exchange about the subject matter. · Final assignment can take form of a paper on a chosen subject or a different format such as a film essay, a poster, a podcast, etc. (proposals of themes and formats are welcome by April 15th at the latest).
Grading Distribution · Regular and active participation—30% · Presentation + leading a group discussion 35% · Final paper of 5-6 pages —35% Ethics of the seminar
· Show respect to each other in discussions · Inform the lecturer (on time) when you cannot attend a class or you will be running late · Feedback more than welcome/open feedback culture · Please refrain from using cell phones during the class |