Zlom v bezpečnostní politice Francie pod vedením Nicolase Sarkozyho? Komparativní analýza účasti v konfliktech s přítomností EU a NATO

• Thesis title in thesis language (Slovak): Zlom v bezpečnostní politice Francie pod vedením Nicolase Sarkozyho? ; Komparativní analýza účasti v konfliktech s přítomností EU a NATO
• Thesis title in Czech: Zlom v bezpečnostní politice Francie pod vedením Nicolase Sarkozyho? ; Komparativní analýza účasti v konfliktech s přítomností EU a NATO
• Thesis title in English: Rupture of the Security Policy of France under the Leadership of Nicolas Sarkozy? Comparative Analysis of Participation in Conflicts with the EU and NATO Presence
• Key words: Francouzsko; zahraniční a bezpečnostní politika; Jacques Chirac; Nicolas Sarkozy; SZBP; NATO; rupture; Artemis; Kongo; EUFOR; Čad; ISAF; Afganistan
• English key words: France; Foreign and Security policy; Jacques Chirac; Nicolas Sarkozy; CFSP; NATO; Rupture; Artemis; Congo; EUFOR; Tchad; ISAF; Afghanistan
• Academic year of topic announcement: 2010/2011
• Thesis type: Bachelor's thesis
• Thesis language: slovenština
• Department: Department of Political Science (23-KP)
• Supervisor: PhDr. JUDr. Tomáš Karásek, Ph.D.
• Author: hidden - assigned by the advisor
• Date of registration: 19.06.2009
• Date of assignment: 19.06.2009
• Date and time of defence: 19.06.2012 00:00
• Venue of defence: IPS FSV UK, 158 00 Praha 5 - Jinonice
• Date of electronic submission: 18.05.2012
• Date of proceeded defence: 19.06.2012
• Opponents: Mgr. Jan Ludvík, Ph.D.

References

Neperiodická literatúra
BOZO, F. (2008). France and NATO under Sarkozy: End of the French Exception. Paris. Fondation pour l'Innovation Politique.

BRÉCHON, P. (2008). Les élections présidentielles en France (Quarante ans d’histoire politique). Paríž: La Documentation française.

CAMERON, A., MAULNY, J.P. (2009). France´s NATO reintegration: Fresh Views with the Sarkozy Presidency?. Londýn: Royal United Services Institute.

GALLIS, P. (2006). NATO in Afghanistan: A Test of the Transatlantic Alliance, CRS Report for Congress. Washington: Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.

GORDON, H. Philip. (1993). A Certain Idea of France: French Security Policy and the Gaullist Legacy. New Yersey: Princeton University Press.

GREVI, G.; HELLY, D.; KEOHANE, D. (2009). European Security and Defence Policy, The First Ten Years (1999-2009). The European Union Institute for Security Studies. Paris: Condé-sur-Noireau.

HOEHN, A.; HARTING, S. (2010). Risking NATO: testing the limits of the alliance in Afghanistan. RAND Corporation for U.S. Air Force.

HOMAN, K. (2007). Operation Artemis in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
In: European Commission. Faster and more United? The Debate about Europe's Crisis Response Capacity. Brusel. s. 151-155.

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH. (2002). Afghanistan: Paying for Taliban’s Crimes, Abuses Against Ethnic Pasthuns in Northern Afghanistan. roč. 14. č. 1.

INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP. (2008). Chad: A New Conflict Resolution Framework [online]. Brusel/Nairobi. Africa Report č. 144. September 2008 [cit. 2012-04-27]. Dostupné na WWW: <http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/africa/central-africa/chad/Chad%20A%20New%20Conflict%20Resolution%20Framework.pdf>

KOOPS, J. (2011). European Union as an Integrative Power? Brusel: VUBPRESS Brusels University Press.

MORELLI, V.; BELKIN, P. (2009). NATO in Afghanistan: A Test of the Transatlantic Alliance, CRS Report for Congress. Washington: Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.

OZVERI, D. (2011). EU’s Impact on Congo Conflict through Operation Artemis: An Early Attempt for Crisis Management Capacity? In: 24th Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference. Istanbul. 6. 7. 2011.

PAYNE, K. (2003). The European Security and Defence Policy and the future of NATO [online]. BBC News Analysis and Research. [cit. 2012-03-21]. Dostupné na WWW: <http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/01-03/payne.pdf>

SEIBERT, B., H. (2010). Operation EUFOR Tchad/RCA and The European Union’s Common Security and Defense Policy. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute.

TERTRAIS, B. (2008). The French White Paper on Defence and National Security: Towards a Stronger and More Streamlined Force (ARI). Madrid. Real Instituto Elcano.

The Military Balance. (2010). London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies.

TRACHTENBERG M. (2012). The Cold War and After: History, Theory, and the Logic of International Politics. New Yersey: Princeton University Press.

TUBIANA, J. (2008). The Chad–Sudan Proxy War and the ‘Darfurization’ of Chad: Myths and Reality. Ženeva: Small Arms Survey, Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment. Working Paper 12.

VAN CREVELD, M. (1991). Transformation of War. New York: Free Press. New York.

Periodická literatúra
ANDREÁNI, G. (1998). La France et l'OTAN après la guerre froide. Politique étrangère. roč. 63. č. 1. s. 77-92.

FIOTT, D. (2008). The French White Paper on Defence and National Security: Peacebuilding, NATO, Nuclear Weapons and Space [online]. International Security Information Service, Europe – European Security Review. č. 40, s. 5-10 [cit. 2012-03-25]. Dostupné na WWW: <http://www.isis-europe.eu/sites/default/files/publications-downloads/2008_esr_62_esr40.pdf>

French parliament rejects no-confidence motion against government on Afghanistan, NATO. International Herald Tribune. 8. 4. 2008.

GOLUB, P. (1986). Chirac-Mitterrand: uneasy cohabitation. Executive Intelligence Review. roč. 13. č. 26.

HENDRICKSON, R.; STRAND, J.; RANEY, K. (2007). Operation Artemis and Javier Solana: EU Prospects for a Stronger Common Foreign and Security Policy. Canadian Military Journal. roč. 8. č. 1. s. 35-42.

JAHIER A. (2010). ESDP Operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Realist Analyst. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies. roč. 4. č. 2. s. 81-92

MACE, C. (2003). Operation Artemis: Mission Improbable? [online]. European Security Review, č. 18. s. 5-7. [cit. 2012-03-12]. Dostupné na WWW: <http://www.isis-europe.eu/sites/default/files/publications-downloads/esr_18.pdf>

MICHEL, L. (2010). Cross-currents in French Defense and U.S. Interests.
Washington: Institute for National Strategic Studies. Strategic Perspectives, č. 10

MICHEL, L. Quelle place pour la France dans l'OTAN?. Le Monde, 5. 6. 2007

MICHEL, L. (2009). Sarkozy’s next big battle; French refusal to integrate fully into NATO has limited its influence on the aliance’s direction. Newsweek. roč. 153, č. 8. s. 24.

PERRET, Q. (2006). NATO and the Future of European Security Policy, Fondation Robert Schuman: European Issues. č. 47.

ROGER, P. L'opposition française craint un „enlisement“ en Afghanistan. Le Monde. 3. 4. 2008.

VAN HERPEN, Marcel. H. (2004). Chirac´s gaullism: Why France has become the driving force behind an autonomous European defence policy. The Romanian Journal of European Affairs, roč. 4, č. 1, s. 67-81

ZHANG, Z. (2002). La politique étrangère de la France entre continuité et ajustements post-guerre froide. Revue internationale et stratégique. č. 45. s. 112-120

Preliminary scope of work

Z metodologického hľadiska som sa najprv zameral na porovnávanie oficiálnych postojov a vyhlásení oboch prezidentov ku konfliktom, v ktorej hrali EÚ a NATO určitú úlohu. Pôvodne sa malo jednať o misie v Afganistane, Gruzínsku, Macedónsku a Kongu, ale po odporúčaní konzultanta som zúžil výber na misiu ISAF v Afganistane, misiu Artemis v Kongu a EUFOR v Čade. Táto zmena sa odohrala hlavne kvôli nedostatočnej podobnosti pôvodne vybratých misií. Po analýze vyhlásení som sa zameral na analýzu participácie Francúzska vo vybraných misiách aj z pohľadu vojenskej účasti alebo finančného zabezpečenia misií. Následným porovnávaním vyhlásení a prístupu participácie Francúzska ku konkrétnym misiám budem vedieť odpovedať okrem iného aj na otázku či účasť Francúzska v NATO bolo a bude vyvažované väčšou účasťou na Europe de la défense v rámci Spoločnej zahraničnej a bezpečnostnej politiky.

Preliminary scope of work in English

From a methodological point of view, I firstly focused on the comparison of official positions and statements of both presidents on the conflicts in which NATO and the EU played important role. Originally I chose the mission in Afghanistan, Georgia, Macedonia and the Congo, but after the consultant's recommendations, I narrowed the selection to the ISAF mission in Afghanistan, the Artemis mission in the Congo and EUFOR in Chad. This change took place mainly due to lack of similarities between originally selected missions. After analysis of the statements I have focused on the analysis of France's participation in selected missions from the perspective of military or financial participation. By further comparison of statements and participation of France in the specific missions I hope to answer the question, among others, whether the French participation in NATO has been and will be counterbalanced by greater participation of France in Europe de la Défense through the Common Foreign and Security Policy.