Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 368)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Ukrajinské téma jako nástroj konsodilace Putinova Ruska
Název práce v češtině: Ukrajinské téma jako nástroj konsodilace Putinova Ruska
Název v anglickém jazyce: The Ukrainian issue as a tool for the consodilation of Putin's Russia
Klíčová slova: Rusko, Putin, historická politika, rusko-ukrajinské vztahy, Velká vlastenecká válka, Ruská pravoslavná církev
Klíčová slova anglicky: Russia, Putin, historical policy, Russian-Ukrainian relations, Great Patriotic War, Russian Orthodox Church
Akademický rok vypsání: 2021/2022
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: čeština
Ústav: Institut mezinárodních studií (23-IMS)
Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Daniela Kolenovská, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 02.05.2022
Datum zadání: 02.05.2022
Datum a čas obhajoby: 03.02.2023 09:45
Místo konání obhajoby: Pekařská 10
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:03.01.2023
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 03.02.2023
Oponenti: PhDr. Jan Šír, Ph.D.
 
 
 
Seznam odborné literatury
Alicja Curanović, „Russia’s Mission in the World“, Problems of Post-Communism, (66:4): 253-267 DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2018.1530940.
Allenova Olga, Geda Elena, Novikov Vladimir, „Blok NATO razoshelsja na blokpakety“, Kommersant, 7.4. 2008, https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/877224.
Armandon Emmanuelle, „Popular Assessments of Ukraine’s Relations with Russia and the European Union under Yanukovych“, Demokratizatsiya, číslo 2, jaro 2013: 289-308 https://demokratizatsiya.pub/archives/21_2_4K638525816L3721.pdf.
Assmann Aleida, „Canon and Archive“, in A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies, ed. Astrid Erll a Ansgar Nünning (Berlin: Degruyter, 2010), 97-108.
Balík Stanislav, Kubát Michal, Teorie a praxe nedemokratických režimů (Praha: Dokořán, 2012).
Balzer Harley, „Managed Pluralism: Vladimir Putin’s Emerging Regime“, Post-Soviet Affairs, č. 19(3) (červenec 2003): 189-227 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251217061_Managed_Pluralism_Vladimir_Putin's_Emerging_Regime.
Borer Douglas A., Morrissette Jason J., „Russian Authoritarian Pluralism: a Local and Global Trend?“, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, č. 4 (prosinec 2006): 571-588 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249017078_Russian_Authoritarian_Pluralism_a_Local_and_Global_Trend.
Brooker Paul, Non-Democratic Regimes (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2014).
Brudny Yitzhak M., Finkel Evgeny, „Why Ukraine Is Not Russia: Hegemonic National Identity and Democracy in Russia and Ukraine“, East European Politics and Societies, Volume 25 č. 4, listopad 2011: 813-833 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0888325411401379.
Budjeryn Mariana, Bunn Matthew, „Budapest Memorandum at 25: Between Past and Future“, Belfer Centre for Science and International Affaires, březen 2020: 1-20 https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/budapest/BM25.pdf.
Coynash Halya, „Perm-36 Gulag Museum of Soviet Repression forced to close“, Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, 3.3. 2015: https://khpg.org/en/1425341993.
Curanović Alicja, „Russia’s Mission in the World“, Problems of Post Communism, 2018: 253-267 https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.1530940.
Curanović Alicja, The sense of mission in Russian foreign policy: destined for greatness! (London: Routledge, 2021).
Efimov Artem, „Kto i zachem pridumal lozung «Mozhem povtorit»? Specialnyjj vypusk «Signala» — novojj ezhednevnojj rassylki «Meduzy»“, Meduza, 9.5. 2022: https://meduza.io/feature/2022/05/09/kto-i-zachem-pridumal-lozung-mozhem-povtorit
Fedor Julie, „Memory, Kinship, and the Mobilization of the Dead: The Russian State and the “Immortal Regiment” Movement“, in War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, ed. Julie Fedor et al. (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017): 307-345 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66523-8_11.
Jarlykova Maria M, Xunda Yu, „Rethinking war history: the evolution of representations of Stalin and his policies during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945 in Soviet and Russian History Textbooks“, Studies in East European Thought, květen 2020: 161-184 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09361-7.
Junker-Kenny Maureen, „Memory and Forgetting in Paul Ricœur’s Theory of the Capable Self“, in A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies, ed. Astrid Erll a Ansgar Nünning (Berlin: Degruyter, 2010), 203-214.
Kara-Murza Vladimir V., „Russia's Local Elections: Politics in Spite of Putin“, World Affairs, č. 3 (září/říjen 2012): 53-60 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41639019.
Kovaljova Natalia, „Bringing Stalin Back In: Memory Politics and the Creation of a Useable Past in Putin’s Russia“, Europe-Asia Studies, Prosinec 2020: 1755-1756 https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.is.cuni.cz/doi/full/10.1080/09668136.2020.1847870.
Ksenija Turkova, „Putin, proshloe i Ukraina“, Golos Ameriki, 13.7. 2021: https://www.golosameriki.com/a/putin-proshloe-i-ukraina/5964382.html.
Kuczyńska- Zonik Aleksandra, „Russia’s Monument Policy in the Baltic States“ in Russia and the EU: Spaces of interaction, ed. Thomas Hoffmann, Andrej Makaryčev (London: Routledge, 2020), 52-70.
Kurfürst Jaroslav, Příběh ruské geopolitiky: Jak se ruská myšlenka zmocnila více než šestiny světa (Praha: Karolinum, 2018).
Laruelle Marlene, „Russia as an anti- liberal European civilisation“, in The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism 2000–15, ed. Pal Kolsto, Helge Blakkisrud (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2016): 275-297 https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/f33588c6-0576-4bea-a29f-bbf0fc3b334d/5.
Linz Juan J., Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes (Londýn: Lynn Rienner Publishers, 2000).
Loewenstein Bedřich, My a ti druzí (Praha: Doplněk, 1997).
Lundby Gjerde Kristian, „The use of history in Russia 2000–2011: the Kremlin and the search for consensus“, East European Politics, (31:2) 2015: 149-169 DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1035779.
Metelec Matěj, „Pohádka O Hodném A Zlém Rusku“, A2, 11/2016, https://www.advojka.cz/archiv/2016/11/pohadka-o-hodnem-a-zlem-rusku.
Miller Alexej, „The Invention of Tradition“, Russia in Global Affairs, č. 2, Duben/Červen 2012: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/the-invention-of-tradition/.
Miller Аlexej I., „National Identity in Ukraine: History and Politics“, Russia In Global Affairs, 2022: 94-114 https://www.academia.edu/84434738/National_Identity_in_Ukraine_History_and_Politics.
Moshes Arkadij, „Russia – Ukraine: Entering a New Phase“ in Ukraine on the Road to Europe, ed. Lutz Hoffmann a Felicitas Möllers (New York: Springer, 2001), 24-31.
Nečepurenko Ivan, „New Policy on Commemorating Victims of Repression At Odds With Actions“, The Moscow Times, 19.8. 2015: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2015/08/19/new-policy-on-commemorating-victims-of-repression-at-odds-with-actions-a49052.
Pearce James C., „Nasha Istoriia: The Russian Revolutions, the State, School Textbooks and Public Celebrations Under Putin“, Revolutionary Russia, č. 1, 2019: 134-153 https://doi-org.ezproxy.is.cuni.cz/10.1080/09546545.2019.1607422,
Péquignot Bruno, „Collective memory and the production of the new“, International Social Science Journal, LXII (62), 1/2 (203/204): 79-87 https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230574.
Prokopjeva Svetlana, „Russia's Immortal Regiment: From Grassroots To 'Quasi-Religious Cult'“, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 12.5. 2017: https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-immortal-regiment-grassroots-to-quasi-religious-cult/28482905.html.
Prus Justyna, „Russia’s Use of History as a Political Weapon“, PISM, Květen 2015: 1-8 https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/191038/PISM%20Policy%20Paper%20no%2012%20(114).pdf.
Putin rasskazal o principakh formirovanija russkogo mira, TASS, 31.10. 2018, https://tass.ru/politika/5741622.
Roberts Kari, „Understanding Putin: The politics of identity and geopolitics in Russian foreign policy discourse“, International Journal, 2017: 28-55 https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702017692609.
Ross Cameron, „Regional Elections and Electoral Malpractice in Russia: The Manipulation of Electoral Rules, Voters, and Votes“, Region, č. 1 (2014): 147-172 https://www.jstor.org/stable/43737662.
Roth Andrew, „How an unlikely PR campaign made a ribbon the symbol of Russian patriotism“, The Washington Post, 9. 5. 2017: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/05/09/how-an-unlikely-pr-campaign-made-a-ribbon-the-symbol-of-russian-patriotism/.
Sestanovich Stephen, „Russian Democracy in Eclipse: Force, Money, And Pluralism“, Journal of Democracy, č. 3 (červenec 2004): 32 https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Sestanovich-15-3.pdf.
Sherr James, „Russia-Ukraine Rapprochement?: The Black Sea Fleet Accords“, Survival, podzim 1997: 33-50 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00396339708442925?needAccess=true.
Smolansky Oles M, „Ukraine and Russia: An Evolving Marriage of Inconvenience“, Orbis, zima 2004: 117-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2003.10.015.
Solik Martin, Baar Vladimír, „The Russian Orthodox Church: An Effective Religious Instrument of Russia’s “Soft” Power Abroad“, Acta Politologica, Vol. 11, no. 3 (2019): 13-41 https://doi.org/10.14712/1803-8220/9_2019.
Suslov Michail, „“Russian World” Concept: Post-Soviet Geopolitical Ideology and the Logic of “Spheres of Influence”, Geopolitics, č. 2 2018: 330-353 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14650045.2017.1407921?journalCode=fgeo20.
Suslov Michail., „“Holy Rus”: The Geopolitical Imagination in the Contemporary Russian Orthodox Church“, Russian Politics and Law, vol. 52, č. 3, květen/červen 2014, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/RUP1061-1940520303, 67-86.
Sweet Julia, „Political Invasions into Collective Memories: Russia“, International Journal of Communication, Září 2016: 4512-4531 https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4406.
Ševcova Lilia, „Russia's Ukraine Obsession“, Journal of Democracy, číslo 1, (leden 2020): 138-147 https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0011.
Ševcova Lilia, „The Russia Factor“, Journal of Democracy, č. 3, (červenec 2014): 74-82 DOI: 10.1353/jod.2014.0038.
Štěpanova Elena, „The Spiritual and Moral Foundation of Civilization in Every Nation for Thousands of Years’: The Traditional Values Discourse in Russia“, Politics, Religion & Ideology, 2015: 119-136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2015.1068167.
Thomas Bremer, „How the Russian Orthodox Church Views the "Russian World"“, Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, Vol. 35 : Iss. 3 , Article 4: 44 https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol35/iss3/4.
Umland Andreas, „Russia’s New “Special Path” After the Orange Revolution Radical Anti-Westernism and Paratotalitarian Neo-Authoritarianism in 2005–8“, Russian Politics and Law, listopad-prosinec 2012: 19-40 DOI: 10.2753/RUP1061-1940500602.
Vystuplenie Svjatejjshego Patriarkha Kirilla na otkrytii XVII Vsemirnogo russkogo narodnogo sobora, 31.10. 2013, http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3334783.html.
Vіdguk Ukraїnskikh Іstorikіv na stattju V.Putіna "Pro іstorichnu єdnіst rosіjan ta ukraїncіv", http://resource.history.org.ua/item/0015897.
Zavadski Andrej, Dubina Vera, „Eclipsing Stalin: The GULAG History Museum in Moscow as a Manifestation of Russia’s Official Memory of Soviet Repression“, Problems of Post-Communism, 26.10. 2021: 1-13 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10758216.2021.1983444.
Zevelev Igor, „Russian National Identity and Foreign Policy“, CSIS, prosinec 2016: 1-19 https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/161208_Zevelev_RussianNationalIdentity_Web.pdf.
Zygar Michail, Všichni muži Kremlu (Příbram: Pistorius, Olšanská, 2016).
Předběžná náplň práce
Téma diplomové práce zjišťuje, jaký byl ruský vnitropolitický kontext eskalace vzájemných rusko-ukrajinských vztahů. Ověřuje tvrzení, že ukrajinské téma sloužilo v průběhu posledních dvou desetiletí ruskému politickému vedení k postupné vnitřní konsolidaci ruské společnosti, zaskočené rozpadem Sovětského svazu, a využití protiukrajinských historických narativů ruskou elitou proto lze interpretovat jako nástroj ustálení postsovětské ruské identity ve tvaru, který vyhovuje aktuálním zájmům ruského mocenského centra. Jakou roli hrála historická politika ve využití ukrajinského tématu k vnitřní konsolidaci Ruska práce zkoumá prostřednictvím rozboru argumentace představitelů Ruské federace vůči Ukrajině, a to od nástupu Vladimira Putina po ruskou invazi na Ukrajinu v roce 2022.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
The topic of the thesis is the Russian domestic political context of the escalation of relations with Ukraine. It verifies the claim that the Ukrainian issue has served the Russian political leadership over the last two decades to gradually consolidate internally Russian society, caught by surprise by the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the use of anti-Ukrainian historical narratives by the Russian elite can therefore be interpreted as a tool to stabilize post-Soviet Russian identity in a form that suits the current interests of the Russian power centre. The thesis explores what role historical politics has played in the use of the Ukrainian issue for Russia's internal consolidation through an analysis of the arguments of the Russian Federation's leaders towards Ukraine, from the rise of Vladimir Putin to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK