Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 368)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
The EU response to the development in Belarus in 2021: the human rights scope
Název práce v češtině: Odpověď EU na vývoj Běloruska v roce 2021: lidskoprávní rovina
Název v anglickém jazyce: The EU response to the development in Belarus in 2021: the human rights scope
Klíčová slova: European Union, Belarus, foreign policy, human rights, human rights defence, resolution, sanctions, restrictive measures.
Klíčová slova anglicky: European Union, Belarus, foreign policy, human rights, human rights defence, resolution, sanctions, restrictive measures.
Akademický rok vypsání: 2019/2020
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: angličtina
Ústav: Katedra evropských studií (23-KZS)
Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Daniela Kolenovská, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 05.10.2021
Datum zadání: 05.10.2021
Datum a čas obhajoby: 19.09.2022 11:00
Místo konání obhajoby: Pekařská 16
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:30.07.2022
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 19.09.2022
Oponenti: Dr. Magdalena Góra
 
 
 
Seznam odborné literatury
Afesorgbor, S. (2019). The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? European Journal of Political Economy.
Ali, M. M., & Shah, I. H. (2000). Sanctions and childhood mortality in Iraq. The Lancet, 355(9218), 1851–1857. Retrieved May 10, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02289-3
Amnesty International (2017). The human rights risks of external migration policies. London. Retrieved May 10, 2022 from http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/593fecfe4.pdf.
Aslund, A., & Hagemejer, J. (2021). EU Sanctions on Belarus as an Effective Policy Tool. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3991710
Belarus: EU adopts 5th package of sanctions over continued human rights abuses and the instrumentalisation of migrants. Consilium. (2021, December 2). Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2021/12/02/belarus-eu-adopts-5th-package-of-sanctions-over-continued-human-rights-abuses-and-the-instrumentalisation-of-migrants/
Belsat. (2022, February 1). How Belarus evades sanctions. Belsat. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://belsat.eu/ru/news/01-02-2022-kak-belarus-obhodit-sanktsii-s-pomoshhyu-partnerov-oligarha-vorobya/
Belta. (2021, November). Belarus to file lawsuits in international courts over losses caused by sanctions. Retrieved May 10, 2022 from https://eng.belta.by/society/view/belarus-to-file-lawsuits-in-international-courts-over-losses-caused-by-sanctions-144674-2021
Bosse, G. (2009). Challenges for EU Governance Through Neighbourhood Policy and Eastern Partnership: The values/security nexus in Eu–Belarus relations. Contemporary Politics, 15(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569770902858152
Bosse, G. (2017). EU–Belarus relations in the context of the European Neighbourhood Policy. In Schumacher, T., Marchetti, A., Demmelhuber, T. (eds.), Handbook of the European Neighbourhood Policy (pp. 290–301). London: Routledge.
Bosse, G., & Vieira, A. (2018). Human rights in Belarus: The EU’s role since 2016. European Parliament Think Tank. Retrieved May 10, 2022 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_STU(2018)603870
Brantner, F., & Gowan, R. (2008). A Global Force for Human Rights? An Audit of European Power at the UN (1st ed.). European Council on Foreign Relations.
Centre Virtuel de la Connaissance sur l'Europe. (2016). The Economic Commission for Europe. Retrieved April 2, 2022, from https://www.cvce.eu/en/education/unit-content/-/unit/026961fe-0d57-4314-a40a-a4ac066a1801/12014f41-b579-4a3e-9499-4e6e066c2df1/Resources#8108664e-9f54-4756-ba22-11a33a0f2ad5_en&overlay
Chernyshova, N. (2020). A Very Belarusian Affair: What Sets the Current Anti-Lukashenka Protests Apart? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo.
Clifton Morgan, T., & Palmer, G. (2015). Japan’s public–private approach to energy security cooperation in Northeast Asia. Energy Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia, 76–99. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767949-10
Consilium. (2022). Timeline - eu restrictive measures against Belarus. Consilium. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/restrictive-measures-against-belarus/belarus-timeline/
Council of Europe. (2020, August 27). Belarus: Joint statement by the Committee of Ministers Presidency, pace president and secretary general. Belarus: joint statement by the Committee of Ministers Presidency, PACE President and Secretary General. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/belarus-joint-statement-by-committee-of-ministers-presidency-pace-president-and-secretary-general
Council of the European Union. (2018a). Basic Principles on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions).
Council of the European Union. (2020b). Belarus: Eu adopts conclusions. Consilium. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/10/12/belarus-eu-adopts-conclusions/
Devitt, P., & Sytas, A. (2021, June 25). Most Belarus potash exports not affected by EU sanctions - analysts. Reuters. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/most-belarus-potash-exports-not-affected-by-eu-sanctions-analysts-2021-06-25/
Dura, G. (2008). The EU's limited response to Belarus' pseudo 'new foreign policy'. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1334064
Eckes, C. (2021). EU global human rights sanctions regime: is the genie out of the bottle? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 30(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.1965556
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2022). The EBRD in Belarus. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.ebrd.com/belarus.html
European Comission. Directorate-General Economic and Financial Affairs (ECFIN). (2022b). European Comission. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vg9hpru5j2xz
European Commission. (2016, November 14). European Democracy Action Plan. European Commission. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/new-push-european-democracy/european-democracy-action-plan_en
European Commission. (2021). EU trade relations with Belarus. European Commission. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/belarus_en
European Commission. (2022, May 10c). European Union, trade in goods with Belarus - European Commission. European Commission. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/country/details_belarus_en.pdf
European Commission. (2022a). Common security and defence policy (CSDP). Migration and Home Affairs. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/pages/glossary/common-security-and-defence-policy-csdp_en
European Economic and Social Committee. Instrumentalisation of migrants. European Economic and Social Committee. (2022, June 22). Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/instrumentalisation-migrants
European External Action Service. (2019, November 18). Statement by the Spokesperson on the parliamentary elections in Belarus. Brussels. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/DELEGATIONS/D-BY/DV/2019/11-27/3a_eeas_statement_elections_BY_2019-11-18_EN.pdf
European Investment Bank. (2021, May 26). EIB's statement concerning 23/5/2021 events in Belarus. European Investment Bank. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.eib.org/en/press/news/eib-statement-concerning-23-may-events-in-belarus.htm
European Paliament. (2022a). Foreign Policy: Aims, Instruments and Achievments. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_5.1.1.pdf
European Parliament. (2009). Common security and defence policy. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_5.1.2.pdf
European Parliament. (2019). Meeting documents. European Parliament eMeeting for Delegations. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://emeeting.europarl.europa.eu/emeeting/delegation/en/archives/D-BY
European Parliament. (2021a). Safety of the nuclear power plant in Ostrovets (Belarus). Debates. Safety of the nuclear power plant in Ostrovets (Belarus) . Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2021-02-11-ITM-005_EN.html
European Parliament. (2021b). Systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by the Belarusian authorities. Text adopted. European Parliament. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/235807/TA-9-2021-0293_EN_Systematic_repression_in_Belarus_&_its_consequences_for_European.pdf
European Parliament. (2021c). Systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by the Belarusian authorities. debate. European Parliament. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2021-06-08-ITM-011_EN.html
European Parliament. (2021d). Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya addresses MEPs. European Parliament. News. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/eu-affairs/20211118STO17610/belarusian-opposition-leader-sviatlana-tsikhanouskaya-addresses-meps
European Parliament. (2021e). European Parliament resolution of 7 October 2021 on the situation in Belarus after one year of protests and their violent repression (2021/2881(RSP)). Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021IP0420
European Parliament. (2022a). Ordinary meetings: Activities: Delegations: European Parliament. Delegations. European Parliament. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/delegations/en/d-by/activities/ordinary-meetings
European Parliament. (2022b). Russia’s war on Ukraine: Sanctions targeting Belarus. European Parliament. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2022/729428/EPRS_ATA(2022)729428_EN.pdf
European Union. (2007, December 13). Treaty of Lisbon. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/LSU/?uri=CELEX%3A12007L%2FTXT
European Union. (2022c). Foreign and security policy. European Union. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://european-union.europa.eu/priorities-and-actions/actions-topic/foreign-and-security-policy_en#:~:text=The%20EU's%20joint%20foreign%20and,in%20the%20EU's%20international%20role
Fernandez E., & Patel, C. (2015). Towards developing a critical and ethical approach for better recognising and protecting human rights defenders. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(7), 896–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1075302
Friis, L., & Murphy, A. (1999). The European Union and Central and Eastern Europe: Governance and Boundaries. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00160
Galindo, G. (2022, March 7). Why the EU's potash sanctions are looming over supermarket prices. Politico. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-sanctions-higher-food-prices-potash/
Golubeva, M. (2021, August 31). EU must be ready to act on its border with Belarus. Politico. Retrieved May 1, 2022 from https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-must-act-border-belarus-latvia-lithuania-poland-migrant-crisis/
Haukkala, H. (2008). The European Union as a Regional Normative Hegemon: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(9), 1601–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802362342
Hudakova, Z., Biersteker, T., & Moret, E. (2021). Sanctions Relaxation and Conflict Resolution. The Carter Center.
Hufbauer, G., Schott, J., Elliott, K., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. By Gary Clyde Hufbauer and Jefferey J. Schott, assisted by Kimberly Ann Elliott (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1985. xvi, 753p. $45.00). Peterson Institute for International Relations.
International Energy Agency. (2022). A 10-point plan to reduce the European Union's reliance on Russian natural gas – analysis. IEA. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.iea.org/reports/a-10-point-plan-to-reduce-the-european-unions-reliance-on-russian-natural-gas
Ivanova, A. (2022, May 18). Belarus is losing up to $ 18 miliard a year. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://p.dw.com/p/4BLIy
Kassim, H., Begg, I., Young, A., & Reland, J. (2020, August 21). The European Council – the who, what, where, how and why. UK in a Changing Europe. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://ukandeu.ac.uk/explainers/the-european-council-the-who-what-where-how-and-why/
Korosteleva, E., & Petrova, I. (2021). Community resilience in Belarus and the EU response. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(S1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13248
Korosteleva, E., & Petrova, I. (2021). Community Resilience in Belarus and the EU response. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(S1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13248
Kratev, I. (2007, May 26). Globalisation: The dangers and the answers. Open Democracy. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article_1918jsp/
Laidi, Z. (2008). EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World: Normative power and social preferences (Routledge/GARNET series) (1st ed.). Routledge.
Lukaszuk, P. (2021). You can smuggle but you can’t hide: Sanction evasion during the Ukraine crisis. University of St.Gallen and Secretariat for Economic Affairs , 71(1), 73–125.
Lynch, D. (2005). Changing Belarus. Chaillot Paper, 25.
Miadzvetskaya, Y. (2021, January 19). Factors that shape EU foreign policy towards Belarus. New Eastern Europe - A bimonthly news magazine dedicated to Central and Eastern European affairs. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://neweasterneurope.eu/2021/01/19/factors-that-shape-eu-foreign-policy-towards-belarus/
Miadzvetskaya, Y. (2022). Designing Sanctions: Lessons from EU Restrictive Measures against Belarus. The German Marshall Fund. https://www.gmfus.org/news/designing-sanctions-lessons-eu-restrictive-measures-against-belarus
Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Tabares, T. E. (1999). Correction to “The Political Determinants of International Trade.” American Political Science Review, 93(4), 931–933. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586123
Neuenkirch, M., & Neumeier, F. (2014). The Impact of UN and US Economic Sanctions on GDP Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2417217
Nussbaum, M. C. (2004). Beyond the social contract: capabilities and global justice. an Olaf Palme lecture, delivered in Oxford on 19 June 2003. Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360081042000184093
Observatory of Economic Complexity. (2022). Belarus (BLR) exports, imports, and trade partners. Observatory of Economic Complexity. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://oec.world/en/profile/country/blr
OHCHR. (2021, July 5). Belarus: Massive human rights violations unprecedented in scope and gravity, says UN expert. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2021/07/belarus-massive-human-rights-violations-unprecedented-scope-and-gravity-says
OSCE. (2022). OSCE/ODIHR alarmed by increasing threats to human rights in Belarus following presidential election. OSCE. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://www.osce.org/odihr/460693
Pierson-Lyzhina, E. (2021). Belarus’s oscillating foreign policy toward the EU: from engagement to retrenchment (1994–2021). Canadian Slavonic Papers, 63(3–4), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2021.1992238
Portela, C. (2011). European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy: When and Why do they Work? (Routledge Advances in European Politics) (1st ed.). Routledge.
Portela, C. (2016). Are European Union sanctions “targeted”? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(3), 912–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2016.1231660
Prodi, R. (Ed.). (2002). A Wider Europe A Proximity Policy as the key to stability. World Conference Jean Monnet Project.
Rayskiy, N. (2021, December 13). Fight for exhausting. Lukashenko first called the workers “terrorists”. Lenta. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://lenta.ru/articles/2020/10/28/bel_zabastovka/
Rettman, A. (2021, December 16). Lukashenko-linked firm suing EUobserver and EU Council. EUobserver. Retrieved April 2, 2022 from https://euobserver.com/world/153839
Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008). Reuniting Ethics and Social Science: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. European Journal of International Law, 22(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2008.00155.x
Smith, S. (1986). Theories of foreign policy: an historical overview. Review of International Studies, 12(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026021050011410x
Survillo I. (2021, November 26). The impact of EU sanctions on Belarus will be limited. Danish Institute For International Studies. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.diis.dk/en/research/the-impact-of-eu-sanctions-on-belarus-will-be-limited
Svobodova, K. (2020, August 13). Czechia denies organizing protests in Belarus and supplying them with flash-grenades. Prague Monitor. Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://praguemonitor.com/news/national/11/08/2020/2020-08-11-czechia-denies-organizing-protests-belarus-and-supplying-them-flash-grenades/aslund
Tilahun, N. (2021). The EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime: between Self Help and Global Governance. International Community Law Review, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-bja10067
Trading Economics. (2022). Belarus Exports By Country. Trading Economics. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://tradingeconomics.com/belarus/exports-by-country
United Nations, & Marin, A. (2020, July). Official report 17th July General Assembly: 72nd session, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 41/22 (No. 72). United Nations.
United Nations, & Marin, A. (2021, May). Official report 4th May 2021 Anais Marin. General Assembly: 76th session, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 44/19. United Nations.
United Nations. (2004). Human Rights Defenders: Protecting the Right to Defend Human Rights (No. 29). Retrieved June 22, 2022 from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet29en.pdf
Vesely, L. (2004). Belarus – Our New Neighbour. Retrieved March 7, 2022 from https://www.amo.cz/en/belarus-our-new-neighbour-2/
Visegrad Insight. (2021, November 26). Path to democracy in Belarus. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://visegradinsight.eu/path-to-democracy-in-belarus/
Vries, W., Portela, C., & Guijarro-Usobiaga, B. (2014). Sanctions. Improving the Effectiveness of Sanctions: A Checklist for the EU. CEPS Special Report, 95.
World Economics. (2022). Economic data for the benefit of investors. Belarus. World Economics. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.worldeconomics.com/
Wyatt, S. J. (2019). The Responsibility to Protect and a Cosmopolitan Approach to Human Protection (New Security Challenges) (Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2019 ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Yeliseyeu, A. (2018, February 8). Belarusian shrimps anyone? how EU Food Products make their way to Russia through Belarus. Think Visegrad. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.globsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Think-Visegrad-Analysis-by-Andrei-Yeliseyeu_Belarusian-shrimps-anyone-GLOBSEC-2017.pdf
Zielonka, J., & Pravda, A. (2001). Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe: Volume 2: International and Transnational Factors (Oxford Studies in Democratization). Oxford University Press.
Předběžná náplň práce
Human rights abuse in Belarus has again become a topical issue on the European Union’s agenda alongside political rights violations since 2020. The Union sees its role in influencing the internal policy of the proclaimed Belarusian government for it to start respecting human rights. As a united body, it has instruments to exercise its foreign policy instruments, such as restrictive measures, negotiations, and communication. The dynamics of their usage have been changing, but there is still potential to review and adapt possible European responses.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
Human rights abuse in Belarus has again become a topical issue on the European Union’s agenda alongside political rights violations since 2020. The Union sees its role in influencing the internal policy of the proclaimed Belarusian government for it to start respecting human rights. As a united body, it has instruments to exercise its foreign policy instruments, such as restrictive measures, negotiations, and communication. The dynamics of their usage have been changing, but there is still potential to review and adapt possible European responses.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK