The Challenges and Prospects of Democratization in the Muslim World: The case of Pakistan
Název práce v češtině: | Výzvy a vyhlídky demokratizace v muslimském světě: případ Pákistánu |
---|---|
Název v anglickém jazyce: | The Challenges and Prospects of Democratization in the Muslim World: The case of Pakistan |
Klíčová slova: | Democracy. Islam. Pakistan. Political system. |
Klíčová slova anglicky: | Democracy. Islam. Pakistan. Political system. |
Akademický rok vypsání: | 2018/2019 |
Typ práce: | diplomová práce |
Jazyk práce: | angličtina |
Ústav: | Katedra politologie (23-KP) |
Vedoucí / školitel: | Janusz Salamon, Ph.D. |
Řešitel: | skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem |
Datum přihlášení: | 31.12.2018 |
Datum zadání: | 31.12.2018 |
Datum a čas obhajoby: | 25.01.2019 08:15 |
Místo konání obhajoby: | Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J3093, Jinonice - místn. č. 3093 |
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: | 04.01.2019 |
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: | 25.01.2019 |
Oponenti: | doc. Martin Riegl, Ph.D. |
Kontrola URKUND: |
Zásady pro vypracování |
According to the FSV requirements on the master´s theses. |
Seznam odborné literatury |
Alfred Stepan and Graeme B. Robertson, “An Arab More than Muslim Electoral Gap,” Journal of Democracy 14 (2003): 40.
Anoushiravan Ehteshami and Abdel Salam Sidahmed, Islamic Fundamentalism (Oxford: Westview Press, 1996). Asef Bayat, Making Islam Democratic: Social Movements and the Post-Islamist Turn (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007), xvii. Azzam Tamimi, Rachid Ghannouchi: A Democrat within Islamism (Cary, NC: Oxford University Press, 2001), E-book, 106. Black, Antony, “The History of Islamic Political Thought”, Edinbrugh University Press, 2011 Bayat, Asef, “Islam and Democracy” What is the real question, Amsterdam University Press, 2007 Bernard Lewis, “Islam and Liberal Democracy: A Historical Overview,” Journal of Democracy 7, no. 2 (1996): 52-63. Bernard Lewis, What Went Wrong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002 Carrie R. Wickam, Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism, and Political Change in Egypt (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002), 7. Charles Kurzman, ed., Modernist Islam, 1840-1940: A Sourcebook (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 3-4. Daniel Pipes, In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2003). Elie Kedourie, Democracy and Arab Political Culture (London: Taylor & Francis, Inc., 1994). Fatema Mernissi, Islam and Democracy: Fear of the Modern World (Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing, 1992). Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: The Free Press, 1992), 217. Fred Halliday, Islam and the Myth of Confrontation (New York: I.B. Taurus, 1996). Hasan al-Banna, “Toward the Light,” in Princeton Readings in Islamist Thought: Texts and Contexts from al-Banna to Bin Laden, ed. Roxanne L. Euben and Muhammad Q. Zaman (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009), 59-60. John L. Esposito and John O. Voll, Islam and Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), Kindle Edition, 13. John L. Esposito, ed. The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Kadivar, M., 2017. Islam and Democracy: Perspectives from Reformist and Traditional Islam. In: Esposito J., Zubaidah Rahim L., Ghobadzadeh N. (eds) The Politics of Islamism. Middle East Today. 1st Edition ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Kamali, Mohammad H. “The Middle Grounds of Islamic Civilisation: The Qur’ānic Principle of Wasaṭiyyah.” IAIS Journal of Civilisation Studies 1, no. 1 (2008): 7– 40. Cf. Muḥammad ‘Abd al-Laṭīf al-Farfūr, Al-Wasaṭiyyah fi’l-islām (Amman: Dār al-Nafā’is, 1409/1988), 71. Lahouari Addi, “Islamicist Utopia and Democracy,” in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science: Political Islam, ed. Charles Butterworth and William Zartman London: Sage Publications, 1992), 120-130. Mohammed Shukri Hanapi, The Wasatiyyah (Moderation) Concept in Islamic Epistemology: A Case Study of its Implementation in Malaysia, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 4, NO. 9(1); July 2014. R. D. Grillo, “Cultural Essentialism and Cultural Anxiety,” Anthropological Theory 3 (2003): 158. Robin B. Wright, Rock the Casbah: Rage and Rebellion across the Islamic World (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2011), 3-4. Edward W Said. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1979. Samuel Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs 72, no. 3 (1993): 22– 49 Samuel P. Huntington, “Will More Countries Become Democratic?,” Political Science Quarterly 99, no. 2 (1984): 208 Tamara Sonn, Islam: A Breif History, (West Sussex, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2010) The Pew Forum on Religious Life, The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics, and Society (Washington, D.C., The Pew Research Center, 2013), 60-61. Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī, Qaḍāyā al-fiqh wa’l-fikr al-mu‘āṣir (Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1427/2006), 578. Yussuf al-Qaradawi, State in Islam (Cairo: Al-Fallah Foundation, 2004), 222 Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, “Islam and Democracy.” In Princeton Readings in Islamist Thought: Texts and Contexts from al-Banna to Bin Laden, edited by Roxanne L. Euben and Muhammad Q. Zaman, 230– 45. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. |
Předběžná náplň práce |
During the first two decades of 21st century the Muslim world has witnessed a rise of authoritative regimes on one hand and a strive for democracy on the other by ousting despotic leaders. Debate on the compatibility of Islam with democracy has gained momentum between academic circles in the recent years often in the context of a “clash” between Western and Islamic civilization. The main objective of this thesis is to contribute to this debate by trying to identify main challenges and prospects of democratization in the Muslim world and answering the primary research questions of this thesis: “Are the key principles of Islam compatible with core values of democracy?” or “Is Islam inherently authoritarian?”.
For this purpose, I will explore various theories such as modernism and reformism, their main arguments and key concepts such as Ijtihad (Independent interpretation), Ijma (Consensus) over Taqleed (Bling following). In this paper, I will look at the i). historical challenges from the Caliphate to current crisis such as ISIS, ii). the challenges rooted in doctrine and ideological political thought, prospects found in doctrine and ideological political thought and the promises of current democratic tendencies in the Muslim world a case study of Pakistan. Working hypotheses: 1. Islam and Democracy share many fundamental principles and values, thus making them inherently compatible. 2. Globally majority of Muslims desire democratic system of government. Methodology: My study will focus on current debates on Islam and democracy alongside with the earlier research published by great modernist and reformist authors. I will apply these theories on case study of Pakistan by conducting qualitative analysis of the political and institutional system of the country. Table of contents: 1. Introduction 2. Literature review 3. Challenges rooted in the History: The early political system of Muslim world 3.1 The state of Medina 3.2 Caliphate 3.3 Demise of Caliphate 3.4 Colonial Era 3.5 Rise of Authoritative regimes 3.6 Current crisis 4. Challenges rooted in Doctrine & Ideological political thought 5. Prospects found in Doctrine & Ideological political thought 5.1 Democracy 5.2 Theories of Democracy 5.3 Islamic or Spiritual Democracy 5.4 Modernist and reformist theories 5.5 Principle of Ijtihad and Ijma 5.6 Principle of Wasatiyyah 6. Promises of the Current Democratic Tendencies in the Muslim world: The case of Pakistan 7. Conclusion 8. Bibliography |
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce |
During the first two decades of 21st century the Muslim world has witnessed a rise of authoritative regimes on one hand and a strive for democracy on the other by ousting despotic leaders. Debate on the compatibility of Islam with democracy has gained momentum between academic circles in the recent years often in the context of a “clash” between Western and Islamic civilization. The main objective of this thesis is to contribute to this debate by trying to identify main challenges and prospects of democratization in the Muslim world and answering the primary research questions of this thesis: “Are the key principles of Islam compatible with core values of democracy?” or “Is Islam inherently authoritarian?”.
For this purpose, I will explore various theories such as modernism and reformism, their main arguments and key concepts such as Ijtihad (Independent interpretation), Ijma (Consensus) over Taqleed (Bling following). In this paper, I will look at the i). historical challenges from the Caliphate to current crisis such as ISIS, ii). the challenges rooted in doctrine and ideological political thought, prospects found in doctrine and ideological political thought and the promises of current democratic tendencies in the Muslim world a case study of Pakistan. Working hypotheses: 1. Islam and Democracy share many fundamental principles and values, thus making them inherently compatible. 2. Globally majority of Muslims desire democratic system of government. Methodology: My study will focus on current debates on Islam and democracy alongside with the earlier research published by great modernist and reformist authors. I will apply these theories on case study of Pakistan by conducting qualitative analysis of the political and institutional system of the country. Table of contents: 1. Introduction 2. Literature review 3. Challenges rooted in the History: The early political system of Muslim world 3.1 The state of Medina 3.2 Caliphate 3.3 Demise of Caliphate 3.4 Colonial Era 3.5 Rise of Authoritative regimes 3.6 Current crisis 4. Challenges rooted in Doctrine & Ideological political thought 5. Prospects found in Doctrine & Ideological political thought 5.1 Democracy 5.2 Theories of Democracy 5.3 Islamic or Spiritual Democracy 5.4 Modernist and reformist theories 5.5 Principle of Ijtihad and Ijma 5.6 Principle of Wasatiyyah 6. Promises of the Current Democratic Tendencies in the Muslim world: The case of Pakistan 7. Conclusion 8. Bibliography |