Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 368)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Tři roky po referendu o brexitu: Analýza twitterových účtů „Leave EU“ a „People's Vote“
Název práce v češtině: Tři roky po referendu o brexitu: Analýza twitterových účtů „Leave EU“ a „People's Vote“
Název v anglickém jazyce: Three years after the Brexit referendum: Analysis of the "Leave EU" and the "People's Vote" Twitter accounts
Klíčová slova: Brexit, Twitter, Spojené království, Leave.EU, People’s Vote, politická komunikace, nastolování agendy, rámcování
Klíčová slova anglicky: Brexit, Twitter, United Kingdom, Leave.EU, People’s Vote, political communication, agenda setting, framing
Akademický rok vypsání: 2017/2018
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: čeština
Ústav: Katedra evropských studií (23-KZS)
Vedoucí / školitel: PhDr. Zuzana Kasáková, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 30.10.2018
Datum zadání: 30.10.2018
Datum a čas obhajoby: 04.02.2020 08:15
Místo konání obhajoby: Staroměstského náměstí 4/1, STAN317, 317, místnost pro nepravidelnou výuku
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:06.01.2020
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 04.02.2020
Oponenti: prof. JUDr. PhDr. Ivo Šlosarčík, Ph.D., LL.M.
 
 
 
Kontrola URKUND:
Seznam odborné literatury
Primární zdroje

@LeaveEUOfficial. Leave.EU. Twitter. Tweety v období od 31.března – 31.října 2019. Dostupné z: https://github.com/kraltucnaku/diploma-thesis-charles-university.
@peoplesvote_uk. People's Vote UK. Twitter. Tweety v období od 31.března – 31.října 2019. Dostupné z: https://github.com/kraltucnaku/diploma-thesis-charles-university.
Sekundární zdroje

Monografie
ČERVENKA, Jan. Agenda-setting: teoretické přístupy. Praha: Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR, 2008. ISBN 978-80-7330-151-4.

DEARING, James a Everett, M ROGERS. Agenda-Setting. SAGE Publications, 1996. ISBN 9780761905639.

DENTON, Robert E. The 1996 presidential campaign: a communication perspective. Westport: Praeger, 1998. Praeger series in political communication. ISBN 0-275-96152-4.

DVOŘÁKOVÁ, I. Obsahová analýza/ formální obsahová analýza/ kvantitativní obsahová analýza. Centrum aplikované antropologie a terénního výzkumu. 2010.

FAGEN, Richard R. Politics and Communication: an analytic study. USA, Little Brown and Company. 1996. ISBN 978-0316273138.

GOFFMAN, Erving. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. 1974, Boston: Northeastern University Press. ISBN 0-930350-91-X.

HOLSTI, O.R. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1969.

JIRÁK, Jan a Barbora KÖPPLOVÁ. Média a společnost: stručný úvod do studia médií a mediální komunikace. Praha: Portál. 2007. ISBN 978-80-7367-287-4.

KRIPPENDORFF, Klaus. Content analysis: An introduction to its Methodology. USA, 2004, Sage Publications. ISBN 0-7619-1545-1.

KŘEČEK, Jan. Politická komunikace: od res publica po public relations. Praha: Grada, 2013. Politologie (Grada). ISBN 978-80-247-3536-8.

KUYPERS, Jim, A. Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action. Lexington Press, 2009. ISBN 978-0739127735.

NIMMO, Dan D. a Keith R. SANDERS. Handbook of political communication. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, c1981. ISBN 0-8039-1714-7.

RÖSSLER, Patrick et al. The international encyclopedia of media effects. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 2017. ISBN 9781118784044.

SMELSER, Neil J. a Paul B. BALTES. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. New York: Elsevier, 2001. ISBN 0080430767.

ŠTĚDROŇ, Bohumír. Politika a politický marketing. V Praze: C.H. Beck, 2013. Beckova edice ekonomie. ISBN 978-80-7400-448-3.
Elektronické články
AGNIHOTRI, Raj, et al. Bringing “Social” Into Sales: The Impact of Salespeople’S Social Media Use on Service Behaviors and Value Creation. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management [online]. 2012, roč. 32, č. 3, p. 333-348. [cit. 2019-11-15]. DOI: 10.2753/PSS0885-3134320304.

AROWOLO, Olasunkanmi. Understanding Framing Theory. Mar. 2017. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25800.52482.
BARISIONE, Mauro. Framing and Deliberation. Deliberative Democracy and the Challenge of Framing Processes. Journal of Public Deliberation [online]. 2012, roč. 8, č. 1. [cit. 2019-11-10]. Dostupné z: https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss1/art2.

ARUGUETE, Natalia. (2017). The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicacion y Sociedad [online].. 28. 35-58. DOI: 10.32870/cys.v0i28.2929.

BRUNS, A., a Y. E. LIANG. Tools and methods for capturing Twitter data during natural disasters. First Monday [online]. 2012, roč. 17, č. 4 [cit. 2019-11-15]. Dostupné z http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/.

COBB, Rober, W., a Charles, D. ELDER. The Politics of Agenda-Bulding: An Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory. The Journal of Politics [online]. 1971, roč. 33, č. 4, s. 892-915. [cit. 2019-11-29]. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2128415.

DEL VICARIO, Michaela. Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate. Social Networks [online]. Červen 2017. [cit. 2019-12-1]. Dostupné z: http://www.10.1016/j.socnet.2017.02.002.

EINSPANNER, Jessica et al. Twitter and Society: Computer-Assisted Content Analysis of Twitter Data. [online]. 2014, č. 89. [cit. 2019-11-15]. Dostupné z: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54492.

FARR, James, et al. Revisiting Lasswell. Policy Science [online]. Březen 2008, roč. 41, č. 1. [cit. 2019-11-5]. Dostupné z: https://doi-org.ezproxy.is.cuni.cz/10.1007/s11077-007-9052-9.

GEKKER, Alex. "Playing with Power: Casual Politicking a New Frame for Political Analysis." The Playful Citizen: Civic Engagement in a Mediatized Culture [online]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2019. p. 387-419. [cit. 2019-11-10]. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcmxpds.25.

GRANT, W.J. et al. Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians’ use of the Social Network Tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science [online]. 2010, roč. 45, č. 4, s. 579–604. [cit. 2019-11-2]. Dostupné z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49245784_Digital_Dialogue_Australian_Politicians'_Use_of_the_Social_Network_Tool_Twitter.

CHEN, Peter, J. Australian Politics in a Digital Age. [online]. 2013, ANU Press. Chapter 3, Social Media, s. 69-112. [cit. 2019-11-3]. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbkkn.11.

KAPLAN, Andreas a Michael HAENLEIN. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons [online]. 2010. [cit. 2019-11-15]. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.

KAUR, Manpreet, VERMA, Rajesh. Social Media: An emerging tool for political participation. International Journal of Social and Organizational Dynamics in IT [online]. 2016, roč. 6, č. 3. [cit. 2019-11-15]. DOI: 10.4018/IJSODIT.2016070103.

LILLEKER, Darren G. Interactivity and Political Communication: hypermedia campaigning in the UK. In Comunicação Pública [online]. 2015, roč. 10, č. 18. [cit. 2019-11-5]. Dostupné z: https://journals.openedition.org/cp/1038?lang=en.

LYCARIÃO, Diogenes a Rafael SAMPAIO. Setting the Public Agenda in the Digital Communication Age. SBPjor [online]. Srpen, 2016. [cit. 2019-11-13]. DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v12n2.2016.882.

MCCOMBES, Maxwell et al. Setting the Agenda of Attributes in the 1996 Spanish General Election. Journal of Communication [online]. 2000, roč. 50, č. 2, s. 77–92. [cit. 2019-11-03]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x.

MCCOMBS, Maxwell E. a Donald, L SHAW. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly [online]. 1972, roč. 36, č. 2, s. 176-87. [cit. 2019-11-29]. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787.

MESSING, Solomon a Sean, J. WESTWOOD. Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online. Communication Research [online]. 2014, roč. 41, č. 8, s. 1042–1063. [cit. 2019-11-23]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406.

MILLER, Daniel, et al. How the World Changed Social Media. [online]. London: UCL Press. 2016. [cit. 2019-11-6]. Dostupné z: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1g69z35.8.

NOVAK-TETER, Ewa. Agenda-setting theory and the new media. Media Studies [online]. 2016, roč. 3, č. 66. [cit. 2019-11-13]. Dostupné z: http://mediastudies.eu/article.php?date=2016_3_66&content=nowak&lang=en.

POLONSKI, Vyacheslav. Impact of Social Media on the Outcome of the EU Referendum. EU Referendum Analysis 2016. [cit. 2019-11-23]. Dostupné z: http://www.referendumanalysis.eu/.

PORTER, Joshua. Relationship Symmetry in Social Networks: Why Facebook will go Fully Asymmetric. [online] Březen 2019. [cit. 2019-11-2]. Dostupné z: http://bokardo.com/archives/relationship-symmetry-in-social-networks-why-facebook-will-go-fully-asymmetric/.

ROSA, Antonio, M. From mass communication to new media: a network perspective. Observatorio. [online]. 2012, roč. 6, č. 3. [cit. 2019-11-3]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS632012562.

SCHEUFELE, Dietram. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society [online]. 2010. roč. 3, s. 297–316. [cit. 2019-11-29]. DOI 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07.

SCHEUFELE, Dietram. Framing As a Theory of Media Effects. The Journal of Communication [online]. 1999, roč. 49. DOI I03-122. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x.

STEMLER, Steve. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation [online]. 2001, roč. 7, č. 17. [cit. 2019-12-2]. Dostupné z: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.

ŠLERKA J. a V. Šisler. Who is Shaping Your Agenda? Social Network Analysis of Anti-Islam and Anti-immigration Movement Audiences on Czech Facebook. In Steiner K., Önnerfors A.: Expressions of Radicalization: Global Politics, Processes and Practices. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, s. p. 61-85. ISBN 978-3-319-65565-9.
USHERWOOD, Simon, AM WRIGHT, Katharine. Sticks and stones: Comparing Twitter campaigning strategies in the European Union referendum. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations [online]. 2017, roč. 19, č. 1, s. 371–388. [cit. 2019-11-2]. DOI: 10.1177/1369148117700659.

VERGEER, Maurice, et al. Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Sage journals [online]. 2013, roč. 19, č. 3. [cit. 2019-11-15]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580.

VLATKOVIĆ, Sandra. New Communication Forms and Political Framing: Twitter in Donald Trump's Presidential Campaign. AM Journal of Art And Media Studies [online]. 16 (2018): 123−134. Doi: 10.25038/am.v0i16.259.

VOWE, Gerard a Philipp HENN. Political Communication in the Online World. [online]. New York, 2015. [cit. 2019-11-29]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707495.
WEBER, Robert. Basic Content Analysis. [online]. 1990, Newbury Park, CA. [cit. 2019-11-15]. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488.

WASIKE, Ben. (2013). Framing News in 140 Characters: How Social Media Editors Frame the News and Interact with Audiences via Twitter. Global Media Journal [online]., Canadian Edition. 6. 5-23. Dostupné z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279545539_Framing_News_in_140_Characters_How_Social_Media_Editors_Frame_the_News_and_Interact_with_Audiences_via_Twitter.

WEIMANN, Gabriel. Reevaluating „The End of Mass Communication?“. Mass Communication and Society. [online]. 2014, roč. 17, č. 6. [cit. 2019-11-25]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.851700.

WENXIU, Peng. Analysis of New Media Communication Based on Lasswell’s “5W” Model. Journal of Educational and Social Research [online]. Září 2015, roč. 5, č. 3, p. 245 [cit. 2019-11-1]. Dostupné z: https://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/7723. ISSN 2240-0524.

WILLIAMSON, Andy et al. Behind the Digital Campaign: An exploration of the use, impact and regulation of digital campaigning. [online] Hansard Society, 2010. [cit. 2019-11-2]. Dostupné z: https://assets.ctfassets.net/u1rlvvbs33ri/4toHB02ftuCsKm82YeiumU/7e05cf1ee0534da6688b4b8712ca2470/Publication__Behind-The-Digital-Campaign-2010.pdf.
Elektronické zdroje
Brexit: Arron Banks challenged over Leave.EU funds. Open Democracy [online]. 2018-11-4 [cit. 2019-12-3]. Dostupné z: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46089236.

COLLINS, Helen. US takes aim at the UK’s National Health Service. POLITICO [online]. 2019-4-6 [cit. 2019-12-4]. Dostupné z: https://www.politico.eu/article/us-takes-aim-at-the-uks-national-health-service/.

DALLISON, Paul. British expats in Berlin protest to remain in the EU in July 2016. Open Britain launched a campaign to push for Britain's best interests as it works toward leaving the EU | Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images Remain MPs launch pro-Europe campaign group. POLITICO [online]. 2019, 2016-9-2 [cit. 2019-12-3]. Dostupné z: https://www.politico.eu/article/remain-mps-launch-pro-europe-campaign-group/.

FINN, Daniel. Jeremy Corbyn Calling Corbyn a ‘terrorist sympathiser’ is just a way to prevent awkward questions. The Guardian [online]. 2019-11-20 [cit. 2019-12-4]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/20/corbyn-terrorist-sympathiser-double-standards.

HANKE, Jacob. The day ‘Project Fear’ got real: Number of companies saying it’s time to move out of UK is picking up. POLITICO [online]. © 2019 POLITICO SPRL, 2019-2-19 [cit. 2019-12-4]. Dostupné z: https://www.politico.eu/article/the-day-project-fear-got-real/.

HARRINGTON, Rebecca. Here's what Trump means when he says 'drain the swamp' — even though it's not an accurate metaphor. Business Insider [online]. 2019, 2016-10-12 [cit. 2019-12-1]. Dostupné z: https://www.businessinsider.com/what-does-drain-the-swamp-mean-was-dc-built-on-a-swamp-2016-11.

JACKSON, Jasper. Arron Banks launches Breitbart-style site Westmonster. The Guardian [online]. 2017-1-19 [cit. 2019-12-3]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/19/arron-banks-launches-breitbart-style-site-westmonster.

KENTISH, Benjamin. 'No evidence' Brexit campaign Leave.EU committed any crimes, National Crime Agency concludes. INDEPENDENT [online]. London: Independent Digital News & Media Limited, 2019, 2019-9-24 [cit. 2019-12-3]. Dostupné z: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-leave-eu-campaign-national-crime-agency-arron-banks-latest-a9117796.html.

LYCARIÃO, Diogenes a Rafael SAMPAIO. Setting the Public Agenda in the Digital Communication Age. SBPjor [online]. Srpen, 2016. [cit. 2019-11-13]. DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v12n2.2016.882.

MASON, Rowena a Anushka ASTHANA. Remain campaigners urge voters to unseat Brexit-backing MPs. The Guardian [online]. 2019, 2017-4-24 [cit. 2019-12-1]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/24/remain-campaigners-urge-voters-to-unseat-brexit-backing-mps.

MASON, Rowena a Rajeev SYAL. Open warfare: the week the People’s Vote campaign imploded. The Guardian [online]. 2019, 2019-10-28 [cit. 2019-12-1]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/28/why-is-the-peoples-vote-campaign-imploding.

MASON, Rowena. Arron Banks threatens to sue thinktank over 'pro-Russian actor' claim. The Guardian [online]. 2019, 2017-2-16 [cit. 2019-12-3]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/16/arron-banks-threatens-to-sue-thinktank-over-pro-russian-actor-claim.

MOROZOV, Evgeny. The brave new world of slacktivism. In Foreign Policy. [Online]. 2009. [cit. 2019-11-23]. Dostupné z: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/.

O´CARROLL, Lisa. How is Boris Johnson's Brexit deal different from Theresa May's? The Guardian [online]. 2019-10-17 [cit. 2019-12-4]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/17/how-is-boris-johnson-brexit-deal-different-from-theresa-mayojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3937/3193.

RAMSEY, Adam. Arron Banks and the missing £11m for Brexit. Open Democracy [online]. 2019, 2018-6-12 [cit. 2019-12-3]. Dostupné z: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/arron-banks-and-missing-11m-for-brexit/.

SPARROW, Andrew. Brexit: Labour to back rebel Tory bid to force Johnson to demand extension – as it happened. The Guardian [online]. 2018-10-18 [cit. 2019-12-4]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/oct/18/boris-johnson-launches-frantic-sales-pitch-of-brexit-deal-ahead-of-commons-vote-politics-live?page=with:block-5da9c4ae8f08993584c89228.

The battle to be the official EU referendum Leave campaign. BBC [online]. 2019, 2016-3-14 [cit. 2019-12-2]. Dostupné z: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-34484687.

WALKER, Peter. Arron Banks gave '£450,000 funding to Nigel Farage after Brexit vote': Tycoon provided Farage with Chelsea home, car and money to promote him in US, Channel 4 News claims. The Guardian [online]. 2019, 2019-5-17 [cit. 2019-12-3]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/16/arron-banks-allegedly-gave-450000-funding-to-nigel-farage-after-brexit-vote.

Why Vote Leave beat Grassroots Out. BBC [online]. 2019, 2016-4-13 [cit. 2019-12-2]. Dostupné z: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36037507.
Předběžná náplň práce
Diplomová práce s názvem Tři roky po referendu o brexitu: Analýza twitterových účtů „Leave EU“ a „Peoples´ Vote“ zkoumá komunikaci dvou twitterových účtů zájmových skupin Leave.EU a People’s Vote. Práce rozebírá za pomocí kvantitativní obsahové analýzy komunikaci obou účtů, nastolování agendy a rámcování obsahu. Cílem práce je rozebrat zaměření a profilaci obou účtů a zjistit do jaké míry je twitterový obsah tvořen na základě zpětné reakce sledujících a jak je tento obsah rámcován.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
This Diploma Thesis called Three years after the Brexit referendum: Analysis of the "Leave EU" and the "People's Vote" Twitter accounts examines communication of two Twitter accounts of the interest groups Leave.EU and People’s Vote. Through quantitative content analysis, the thesis analyses the communication of both accounts, agenda-setting and framing of content. The goal of this thesis is to examine the behaviour and profiling of both accounts and to find out to what extent is the content created based on reactions of the followers and how is this content framed.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK