Fenomén spolupráce OSN a regionálních afrických organizací: Evaluace peacekeepingových misí

• Název práce v češtině: Fenomén spolupráce OSN a regionálních afrických organizací: ; Evaluace peacekeepingových misí
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Cooperation between the UN and regional African organizations phenomenon: ; Peacekeeping mission
• Klíčová slova: Mezinárodní organizace, bezpečnost, regionalismus, peacekeeping, regionální organizace, spolupráce, evaluace mírových misí, OSN, ECOWAS, AU.
• Klíčová slova anglicky: International organizations, security, regionalism, peacekeeping, regional organizations, cooperation, evaluation process of peacekeeping operations, UN, ECOWAS, AU.
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2010/2011
• Typ práce: rigorózní práce
• Jazyk práce: čeština
• Ústav: Katedra mezinárodních vztahů (23-KMV)
• Vedoucí / školitel: prof. Mgr. Oldřich Bureš, Ph.D., M.A.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 08.02.2011
• Datum zadání: 08.02.2011
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 30.03.2011 00:00
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 15.02.2011
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 30.03.2011
• Oponenti: PhDr. Kateřina Werkman, Ph.D.

Seznam odborné literatury

Primární zdroje:
o OSN, Charta OSN, UN Department of Public Information, 1994,
o Charta OAU, 1963, http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/Documents/Treaties/text/OAU_Charter_1963.pdf (1.10.2009),
o AU, Konstituční akt, 2000, http://www.iss.co.za/Af/RegOrg/unity_to_union/pdfs/oau/treaties/Constit_Act_of_AU_2000.pdf (14.11.2009),
o OAU, High Level Delagation on 34th Session of Assembly of OAU, 1998,
o AU Commission, AHG,/Dec. 130 (XXXIV),
o AU, AHG/Dec 144 (XXVI), 2000,
o ECOWAS, „Treaty of ECOWAS“,
o ECOWAS, „Draft of mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolutions, Peacekeeping and Security“, 1993,
o S/2000/643 (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/508/71/PDF/N0050871.pdf?OpenElement)
o OSN, Rezoluce OSN, 1298, 2000 (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/437/11/PDF/N0043711.pdf?OpenElement)
o OSN, Rezoluce OSN, 1227, 1999, (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/035/07/PDF/N9903507.pdf?OpenElement)
o OSN, Rezoluce OSN, 1312, 2000, (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/583/66/PDF/N0058366.pdf?OpenElement)
o OSN, S/25402, „Situation in Liberia“, 1993, (http://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/93-95/CHAPTER%208/AFRICA/item%2005-%20Liberia.pdf)
o OSN, Rezoluce OSN, 866, 1993 (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N93/513/89/PDF/N9351389.pdf?OpenElement)
o OSN, Rezoluce OSN, 788, 1992, (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N93/010/46/IMG/N9301046.pdf?OpenElement)
o OSN, Rezoluce OSN, 1556, 2004, (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/446/02/PDF/N0444602.pdf?OpenElement)
o OSN/AU, „„Report of the Secretary General and the Chairperson of the African Union Commission on the hybrid operation in Darfur“, S/2007/307/Rev. 1, 2007, (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N07/420/21/PDF/N0742021.pdf?OpenElement)
o AU, „Status of Mission Agreement on the Establishment and Management of the Ceasefire Commission in the Darfur area of the Sudan“, 2004,
o US government accountability Office, Darfur Crisis, GAO_07_24, Washington, 2007,
o OSN, “Yearbook of the United Nations: International Peace and Security”, 1994,
o International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, „Responsibility to Protect“, International Development Research Centre, 2001,
o Boutros-Ghali, B., „An Agenda for Peace“, UN Publications, 1995,
o Panel on UN Peace Operations, A/55/305, S/2000/809, „Brahimi report“, 2000,
o AU, „The vision of the AU“, 2002,
o Zprávy GT, z června roku 2000 (S/2000/643),
o Report of the Chairperson of the Commission on the Situation in Darfur, PSC/PR/2(XVII), AU, str. 6/7,
o OSN, Monthly Summary of Troop contribution to UNPO, 31/12/2000,
o OSN, Monthly Summary of Troop contribution to UNPO, 01/01/2001,
o OSN, „Troops Contribution“, Public Information Departement, 2006, http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/contributors/95-05.shtml (11.10.2009),
o OAU, Cotonou Agreement, http://www.usip.org/files/file/resources/collections/peace_agreements/liberia_07251993.pdf (11.10.2009),
o OSN, „United Nations Peacekeeping from 1991 to 2000: Statistical Data and Charts, Peace and Security section“, DPKO, 2001,
o OSN, Panel on UN Peace Operations, „Brahimi Report“, 2000, http://www.un.org/peace/reports/peace_operations/ (23.09.2009),
o Peace Plan Liberia, 2003, http://www.jmls.edu/library/pdf/Appendix%202%20Liberia%20Ceasfire%20and%20Cessation%20of%20Hostilities%20Agreement.pdf (16.11.2009),
o OAU, Prohlášení Salima A. Salima, 68. zasedání Rady ministrů, 1998,
o ECOWAS Commission, CM/Res.1561 (LXI),
o AU, „African Union in the Nutshell“, 2002, http://www.africa-union.org/root/AU/AboutAu/au_in_a_nutshell_en.htm – african union in the nutshell, (10.10.2009),
o OSN Press, „Závěrečné dokumenty Světového summitu“, 2005, http://www.un.org/summit2005/presskit/fact_sheet.pdf (2010-12-08),
o UNHCR, „Regional Operations Programme: Nigeria“, The UN Refugee Agency, 2008,
o OSN, UNDP, „Human Development Report“, UN Press, 1994,
o ICISS, „Responsibility to Protect“, ICISS, 2001,
o Rome Statute, MTS, http://untreaty.un.org/uod/icc/statute/romefra.htm,

Knihy a kapitoly:

o Adibe, C., „Do Regional Organizations Matter? Comparation the Conflict Management Mechanism in West Africa and the Great Lakes Region, str. 83, kapitola z: boulden, J., „Dealing with conflict in Africa: The United Nations and Regional Organizations“, Palgrave, 2003,
o Alger, Ch., „The future of the United Nations system: Potential for twenty-frist Century“, Edited by US University Press, 1998,
o Archer, C., „International Organizations“, Routledge, třetí vydání, 2001,
o Baldwin, D., „Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The contemporary debate“, Columbia University, 1993,
o Baylis, J., Smith, S., „the globalization of world politics“, druhé vydání, Oxford University Press, 2001,
o Bellamy, A. Williams P, Griffin, S., „Understandign Peacekeeping“, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2004,
o Berman, E., Sams, K., „African Regional Organizations“, str 25 – 77, kapitola z: Boulden, J., „Dealing with conflict in Africa“, Palgrave, 2003,
o Berman, E., Sams, K., „Peacekeeping and the Organization of African Unity“, PSIS, 2000,
o Berman, E., Sams, K., „Peacekeeping in Africa:Capabilities and Culpabilities“, Institute for Security Studies, 2000,
o Byers, M., Chesterman, S., „Changing the rules about rules?“, kapitola z: Holzgrafe, J., Keohane, R., „Humanitarian intervention“, Cambridge University Press, 2003,
o Buzan, B., “The Logic of Regional Security in the Post-Cold War World”, str 1-26, kapitola z: Hettne, B. a kolektiv, “The new Regionalism and the Future of Security and Development”, UNU/WIDER study, New York, 2000,
o Buzan, B., Hansen, L., „the Evolution of International Security Studies“, Cambridge University Press, 2009,
o Buzan, b., Weaver, O., „Bezpečnost: Nový rámec pro analýzu“, Centrum Strategických studií, 2000,
o Cassese, A., „United Nationals Peacekeeping: Legal Essays“, Sijhoff a Noordhoff, 1978,
o Collins, A., „Traditional Approaches“, kapitola z: „Contemporarry Security Studies“, Oxford University Press, New York, 2007,
o Diehl, P., „Peace Operations“, Polity, 2008,
o Diehl, P., „International Peacekeeping: With a new epilogue on Somalia, Bosnia and Cambodia“, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994,
o Doob, L., „Review: Peacekeepers´ Handboodk“, International Peace Academy, 1978,
o Doyle, M., „Making war and building peace: United Nations Peace Operations“, 2006,
o Dowyaro, E., „Boundaries of Peace Operations: The African Dimension“, Edited by Mark Malan, ISSAfrica, 2000,
o Enloe, C., „the Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire“, Berkley, 2004,
o Fasulo, L., „An Insider´s guide to the UN“, Yale University Press, 2009,
o Fawcett, L., The evolving architecture of regionalization“, v Pugh, M., Sidhu, W., „The United Nationsa nd Regional Security: Europe and beyonde“, Lynne Rienner, 2004,
o Ferguson, N., „Colossus: Vzestup a pád amerického impéria“, Dokořán, 2005,
o Francis, D., „Uniting Africa“, Ashgate, 2006,
o Gilpin, R., „War and Changes in World Politics“, cambridge University Press, 1981
o Glickman, H., „The Darfur Crisis“, Foreign Policy Research Intitute, 2006,
o Graham, K., „Regional Security and Global Governance“, Bruges, 2003,
o Haas, E., „The Uniting of Europe“, Stanford University press, 1958,
o Hampson, O., „Human Security and World Disorder“, Oxford University press, 2002,
o Hettne, B. a kolektiv, “The new Regionalism and the Future of Security and Development”, UNU/WIDER study, New York, 2000,
o Hoffmann, s., „The state of war: Essay on the theory and pracitece of international politics“, Pall Mall, 1965,
o Hobson, J., A., „Imperialism: A study“, George Allen and Unwing, třetí vydání, 1938,
o Chadwick, A., „The Future of the United Nations system: potential for 21st century“, UN University, 1998,
o Kant, I., Political Writings“, Cambridge University Press, 1991,
o Karlas, J., „Forma mezinárodních institucí: teoretická analýza“, Karolinum, 2008,
o Keller, E., „African Conflict Management and the New World Order“, UC Berkeley,
o Keohane, R., „International Institutions and State Power“, Westview Press, 1989,
o Keohane, R., Nye, J., „Transnational Relations and World Poltiics, Harvard University Press, 1971,
o Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, 1995,
o Lata, L., „The Ethiopia-Eritrea War, kapitola, z: Boulden J., „Dealing with conflict in Africa: The UN and Regional organizations“, Palgrave, 2003,
o Malan, M., “Conflict Management, Peacekeeping and Peacebuilding: Lessons for Africa, kapitola z Rittberger, V., Zangel B., International Organization, Polity, Politics and Policies, Palgrave, New York, 2006,
o Malone, D.; “The UN Security Council: from the Cold War to the 21st Century”, New York; Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2004,
o McRae, R., Hubert, D., „Human security and new diplomacy“, McGill-Queen´s University press, 2001,
o Mitrany, D., „A working peace system“, Quadrangle books, 1966,
o Olonisakin, F., „Liberia“, kapitola z: Boulden J., „Dealing with conflict in Africa: The UN and Regional organizations“, Palgrave, 2003,
o Ojanen, H., „Peacekeeping and peacebuilding: preparing for future“, Finishc Institute of International Studies, 2006,
o Ondřej, J., „Základy mezinárodního práva“, Karolinum 1998,
o Powell, K., „The African Union´s emefrging Peace and Security system“, The North – South Institute, 2005,
o Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., Encyclopedia of International Peacekeeping Operations“, ABC-Clio,1999,
o Ramsbotham, O.; Woodhouse, T.; Miall, H.; Contemporary Conflict Resolution; 2. vydání, Cambridge; Polity Press; 2005,
o Rittberger, V., Zangel, B., „International Organizations: Polity, Politics and Policies“, Palgrave, 2006,
o Rossamond, B., „Theories of European Integration, New York, 2000,
o Soderbaum, F., „The Role of the Regional Factor in West Africa“, kapitola z: Hettne, B. a kolektiv, “The new Regionalism and the Future of Security and Development”, UNU/WIDER study, New York, 2000,
o Soderbaum, F., Shaw, F., „Theories of New Regionalism“, Palgrave, 2003,
o Suganami, H., „The domestic analogy and world order proposals“, cambridge University Press, 1989,
o Thakur, R., „The United Nations, Peace and Security“, Cambridge University Press, Edinburgh, 2008,
o Rickner, A., „Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold war era“, colubia University Press, 2001,
o Vasquez, J., „The power of power politics: From classical realism to neotraditionalism“, Cambridge University Press, 1998,
o Waewer, O., Buzan, B., Wilde, J., “Security : A New Framework for Analysis” Boulder: Rienner, 1998,
o Waisová, Š., „Současné otázky mezinárodní bezpečnosti“, Aleš Čeněk, 2003,
o Wallensteen, P., „Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System, Sage, 2002,
o Waltz, K., „Theory of International Politics“, Addison Wesley, 1979,
o Wilson, W., „Guarantees of Peace“, Harper and Brothers, 1918,
o Wolfers, A., „Discor d and Collaboration“, Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962,
o OSN, “Basic Facts about the UN”, UN Department of Public Information, 2003
o The Military Balance 2009, „UN Peackeeping at 60“, IISS,2009,
o ECOWAS, „Silver Jubilee Anniversary (1975-2000): Achievement and Prospects, Abuja, 2000,


Články:
o Annan, K., „Two concepts of sovereignity“, The Economist, September 18, 1999,
o Adeleke, A., „The ECOWAS operation in Liberia“, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 33/4, 1995,
o Adeleke, A., „The Politics and Diplomacy of Peacekeeping in West Africa: The ECOWAS Operation in Liberia“, The Journal of Modern African Studies, vol 33/4, 1995,
o Algappa, M., „Regionalism and conflict management: A framework for Analysis“, Review of International Studies, 21/4, 1995,
o Angelov, A., „Regional Involvement in Peace Operations: And Analysis of the Debate withing the UNSC“, Conclict, Security and Development, 10/5, 2010,
o Axworthy, L., „Human security and global governance: Putting People first“, Global Governance, vol. 7, 2001,
o Bellamy, A., „The Responsibiity to Protect – Five Years On“, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 24/2, 2010,
o Bellamy, A., „Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 20005 World Summit“, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 20/2, 2006,
o Berman, E., „The limits of regional peacekeeping in Africa“, Peacekeeping and International Relations, vol. 99/4, 2008,
o Bureš, O., „Wanted: A mid-range Theory of International Peacekeeping“, International Studiew Review, 2007,
o Burgess, S., „African Security in the Twenty-First Centruy: The Challenges of Indigenization and Multilateralism“, African Studies Review, vol. 41/2, 1998,
o Clark, J., „Debacle in Somalia“, Foreign Affairs, vol. 72/1, 1992/93,
o Diehl, P., “Are there concepts of peackeeping success or failure?”, z: Druckman, D. Stern, P. „Evaluating Peacekeeping Missions, Mershon International Studies Review, vol. 41/1, 1997,
o Diehl, P., „Insitutional alternative to trditional UN Peacekeeping“, Armed Forces and Society, vol. 19/2, 2006,
o Diehl, P., „Peacekeeping Operations and the Quest for Peace“, Political Science Qurterly, vol. 103/3, 1988,
o Diehl. P, Druckman, D., Wall, J., „Internationa Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution“, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, voll. 42/1, 1998,
o De Waal, A., „Darfur and the failure of the responsibility to protect“, International Affairs, 83/6, 2007,
o Dorn, W., „Regional Peacekeeping ins not the way“, Peacekeeping and International Relations, vol. 27/3, 1997,
o Dowyaro, E., Boundaries of Peace Operations: The African Dimension, Edited by Mark Malan, ISSAfrica, 2000
o Druckman, D., Stern, P., „Evaluating Peacekeeping Missions“, MErshon International Studies Review, vol. 41/1, 1997,
o Durch, W., „Building on Sand – UN Peacekeeping in the Western Sahara“, International Security, vol. 17/4, 1993,
o Durch, W., „Evaluating Peacekeeping Missions“ The Forum, Mershon International Studiew Review, vol. 41/1, 2000,
o Eide, A., „Peacekeeping and enforcement by Regional Organizations“, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 3/2, 1966,
o Fawcett, L., „Exploring regional domains: A comparative histroy of regionalis“, International Affairs, vol. 80/3, 1998,
o Fetherston, B., „Evaluating Peacekeeping Missions“, The Forum, Mershon International Studiew Review, vol. 41/1, 2000,
o Glaser, Ch., „Structural Realism in a moral complex wordl“, Review of International Studies, vol. 29/3, 2003,
o Goulding, M., „The evolution of United Nations Peacekeeping“, International Affairs, vol. 69/3, 1993,
o Goulding, M., „The UN and Conflict in Africa since the Cold War“, African Affairs, vol. 98/391, 1999,
o Hettne, B., Inotai, A., „The New Regionalism“, World Institute for Development of Economic Research“, 1994,
o Howe, H., „Lessons of Liberia: ECOMOG regional peacekeeping“, International Security, vol. 21/3, 1996/97,
o International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, „Responsibility to Protect“, International Development Research Centre, 2001,
o Johansen, R., „U.N. Peacekeeping: How Should We Measure Success?“, Mershon International Studies Review, vol. 38/2, 1994,
o Keohane, R., Martin, L., „The Promise of Institutional Theory“, International Security, 20/1, 1995,
o Kupchan, Ch., „The Promise of collective Security“, International Security, vol. 20/1, 1995,
o MacFarlane, S., Weiss, T., „Regional Organizations and Regional Security“, Security Studies, vol. 2/1, 1992,
o Maurice, M., „Regional peacekeeping: The case for complementary Efforts“, Peacekeeping and International Relations, vol. 25/3, 1996,
o MacFarlane, S., Weiss, T., „Regional Organizations and Regional Security“, Security Studies, vol. 2/1, 1992,
o Mersheimer, J., „Back to the Future: Instability after the cold War“, International Secuirty, vol. 15/1, 1990,
o Mersheimer, J., „The False Promise of International Institutions“, International Security, vol. 19/3, 1994,
o Mersheimer, J., „A Realist Replay“, International Security, vol. 21/1, 1995,
o Moravcsik, A., „A liberalTheory of International Politics“, International Orgaization, vol. 51, 1997,
o Neethling, T., „International peacekeeping trends: the significance of African contribution to African peacekeeping requirements“, Politikon, vol. 31/1, 2004,
o O´Brien, D., „The Search for Subsidiarity: The UN, African Regional Organizations and Humanitarian Action“, International peacekeeping, vol. 7/3, 2000,
o Rambotham; O., Woodhouse, T., „Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict“ Journal of peace research, vol. 34/11,
o Ramsbotham, A., „Peacekkeping Mission Updates: January-March, International Peacekeeping, vol. 13/4, 2006,
o Rechner, J., „From the OAU to the AU“, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 39/543, 2006,
o Rozhovor s Dawit Egzaibher, Peacescope, 1/1, 1982,
o Rothschield, E., „What is Security“, Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Science, vol. 124, 1995,
o Ruggie, J., „The false premise of realism“, International Security, vol. 20/1, 1995,
o Scheffer, D., „Atrocity crimes framing the responsibility to protect“, Genocide studiew and prevention, vol. 2/1, 2007,
o Sinha, M., „Humanitarian Intervention by the United Nations“ Journal of Peace Research, vol. 41/4 2004,
o Thakur, R., „From peacekeeping to peaceenfrocement: The UN operation in Somalia“, The Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 32/3, 1994,
o Ullman, R., „Redefinin security“, International Security, vol. 8/1, 1993,
o Waisová, Š., „Lidská bezpečnost – pojetí a strategie, Mezinárodní vztahy, 41/1, 2006,
o Wallensteen, P., Gleditsch, N., a kol., „Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset“, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 39/5, 2002,
o Waltz, K., „Structural Realism after the Cold War“, International Security, vol. 25/1, 2000,
o Wendt, A., „Constructing International Politics“, International Security, vol. 20/1, 1995,
o Williams, D., „International Peacekeeping: The challenges of state-building and regionalization“, International Affairs, vol. 81/1/2005,

Předběžná náplň práce

Mezinárodní systém je tvořen různými aktéry. Jejich pozice a vztahy se mění v průběhu času. Mezi těmito aktéry dochází k interakcím v různých oblastech. Jednou z klíčových oblastí je bezpečnost. Dominantní postavení v této problematice mají státy, které však přenechávají část svých pravomocí mezinárodním organizacím. K udržování míru slouží jako jeden z nástrojů mezinárodních organizací operace pro udržení míru. Tzv. peacekeeping je dynamický obor co do praxe i teoretického uchopení. K velkým změnám došlo především v průběhu 90. let v návaznosti na četné neúspěchy tradičního přístupu k operacím na udržení míru ve srovnání s novými podmínkami konfliktů té doby. Africký kontinent je v tomto ohledu velikou výzvou pro struktury Organizace spojených národů i regionálních organizací. Vzhledem ke koloniální minulosti kontinentu a častým výskytům krizí a konfliktů zde existuje nutnost vytvoření určitého stabilního rámce peacekeepingu pro tuto oblast. Jedna z možných variant vývoje je také širší zapojení regionálních organizací do zajišťování bezpečnosti v jejich vlastním teritoriu. Na tuto problematiku je nutno nahlížet z několika teoretických rámců. V této práci je to rámec vývoje regionalismu a rozšiřování konceptu bezpečnosti, jako hlavní faktory, které zapojení regionálních organizací ovlivňují. Abychom byli schopni posoudit vhodnost spolupráce při peacekeepingu, je nutné nejprve analyzovat mise obsahující spolupráci na základě určitých evaluačních faktorů. Tyto faktory byly stanoveny pomocí teoretického rámce z oboru mezinárodních organizací, bezpečnosti a evaluace peacekeepingových operací a dále sloužily jako nástroj pro analýzu konkrétních případových studií. Komparací analýz jednotlivých případů bude možné vyvodit všeobecnější závěry použitelné k popsání systému spolupráce mezi OSN a regionálními organizacemi jako efektivního rámce pro budoucnost.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

International system is made by several different actors. Their position and relations are variable in time. We can see different interactions within actors. One of the most important fields is security. International organizations have primary position in this field, but some of their authorities were shifted to international organizations. In the group of instruments for maintaining international peace and security we can find also peacekeeping missions. Peacekeeping is dynamic field of conflict management in practice and also in theory. Big changes occurred namely in 90s according to several failures of conflict management and namely peacekeeping in that period. African continent is a big challenge in this for structures as The United Nations and regional organization themselves. In regard of colonial past of this continent and often appearance of conflicts, some stable frame system is needed to be proposed for conflict management in this region. One of the possible solutions is deeper involvement of regional organizations into dealing with conflicts on their own territory. We have to consider the framework of cooperation from several different theoretical perspectives, such as – development of regionalism and widening of security concept. To achieve this firstly we have to analyze mission involving the sign of cooperation in the frame of some important factors. These factors were set up in the process of this research on the basis of theoretical frame of these fields: international organizations, security and evaluation process of peacekeeping operations. Then were used as a tools for analyzes concrete case studies. By comparison of these cases we will be able to deduce some of general outcomes which could be used as framework for future missions.