Při výběru garanta předmětu se zobrazují připomínky jak k němu, tak ke všem vyučujícím daného předmětu. Při výběru vyučujícího, který garantem není, se zobrazují připomínky vztažené pouze k němu.
The practicals were basically nonexistent. Most of them were used to finish some lectures. Lecturer send us, usually day before practicals, set of exercises and assumed that we had time to look at them. During the practicals, which usually lasted for 30 or 20 minutes, there were solved one or two exercises in a very informal manner, which was hard to understand. We never got any solutions to the rest, so it was hard to understand any them.
We were sent an example sheet before the practucals and were expected to look at it before the practicals and try to solve some of the examples. This could work if we didn't recieve the email a day before so most of the students didn't have the time to look at it at all. During the practicals he looked annoyed that we didn't know how to solve things that he thought were trivial (maybe it was because he didn't explain it well enough and never showed us any solutions properly???). Then he would handwave the solutions so we never learned how to solve anything. Overall the practicals were basically useless.
Lectures were fast and confusing. Lecturer also didn't write linearly on the board, so it was hard to follow. He wasn't very eager to answer questions and looked annoyed when the students didn't understand his explanations of concepts in the lecture.
The lectures were chaotic and somehow too fast but also too slow so they often overspilled into our practicals. It didn't help that the lecturer wrote on the board in very nonlinear fashion so it was hard to follow. This seemed to frustrate him because every time students were looking at the board confused he would start to give a similarly fast and chaotic explanation (which didn't help at all) and then he would say something like "I couldn't explain it better".
