|
|
Připomínky k výuce (Oba semestry)
Při výběru garanta předmětu se zobrazují připomínky jak k němu, tak ke všem vyučujícím daného předmětu. Při výběru vyučujícího, který garantem není, se zobrazují připomínky vztažené pouze k němu.
| doc. Faruk Göloglu, Dr. rer. nat. [32-KA], Kryptoanalýza [NMMB404, přednáška] |
| Student zakázal zobrazování osobních údajů, 15.09.2024, 2. ročník, Matematika pro informační technologie, navazující magisterské |
| + The lecturer was willing to help. It was not a problem to arrange a meeting.
- I do not like the organization of this course at all. It was chaotic and quite demotivating. Homeworks Part of the classification were labworks. There were too many assignments. They were extremely time-consuming. I think half of them would be enough. The teacher checked our labworks at the end of semester (not before). We could ask for a feedback in the form of a meeting. However, he did not checked them before the meeting, so we had to explain everything to him (some of the labworks were from February...) I think he did not try to write some of these assignments himself, thus he could not estimate the difficulty. Lectures It seemed to me that lectures were not well-prepared. Most of students prefered reading materials at home. Practicals Practicals were just about writing our labworks. We could ask the teacher for help during practicals. Most of the students prefered to write the labworks at home. Exam The classification consisted of three parts. One of them was the final labwork. We obtained the labwork description at the end of the semester, thus we could not finish it before the examination period or holidays. Part of the labwork was a meeting where we had to explain our solution. The final labwork seemed too difficult to me and as far as I know nobody managed to finish it. The only resource was the book, where the algorithm was not described very clearly. There was a deadline - August. During August the teacher gave us an easier assignment and a new deadline. Grades The lecturer has a very funny system of grading. He grades you after comparing you with your classemates. If everybody fails to do something, you get better grade. If you have a clever classemate, you are unlucky and you obtain much worse grade for the same work. Most of the students obtain 2 or 3, only one or two students obtain 1. There are no fixed rules for grading, so you have to wait until everybody submits the labwork. Most of the students do not have the grade yet (15. 9.) |
| Student zakázal zobrazování osobních údajů, 15.09.2024, 2. ročník, Matematika pro informační technologie, navazující magisterské |
| Faruk is very willing to help if you ask. He also replies quite fast to e-mails. The organization of the course was, however, very chaotic.
There were in my opinion too many assignments (labworks) for the course's credit worth. Some of the assignments given to us he did not even try to check how relevant/difficult they are. Some of the assignments were very time consuming. Faruk also gave us an assignment, which was a part of the grade, during the last couple of days of the semester. A lot of the lectures seemed unprepared so most of the studednts did not even attend and instead learned the subjects from the materials provided, which were most of the time great. The lectures looked like he printed a couple of pages from the material short time before the lecture and highlighted the important parts. There also were no fixed rules for getting grades. Additionally nearly no one has grades to this day (15. 9. 2024). In general, the course seemed very unprepared. There were too many assignments (roughly twice as much compared to the last year) and the lectures were prepared poorly. |
| Připomínka k předmětu, Kryptoanalýza [NMMB404, přednáška] |
| Student zakázal zobrazování osobních údajů, 15.09.2024, 2. ročník, Matematika pro informační technologie, navazující magisterské |
| Topics are interesting. |
| Student zakázal zobrazování osobních údajů, 15.09.2024, 2. ročník, Matematika pro informační technologie, navazující magisterské |
| Topics are interesting. However, the course was not very good due to poor organization.
The organization of the course was, however, very chaotic. There were in my opinion too many assignments (labworks) for the course's credit worth. Some of the assignments given to us he did not even try to check how relevant/difficult they are. Some of the assignments were very time consuming. Faruk also gave us an assignment, which was a part of the grade, during the last couple of days of the semester. A lot of the lectures seemed unprepared so most of the studednts did not even attend and instead learned the subjects from the materials provided, which were most of the time great. The lectures looked like he printed a couple of pages from the material short time before the lecture and highlighted the important parts. There also were no fixed rules for getting grades. Additionally nearly no one has grades to this day (15. 9. 2024). In general, the course seemed very unprepared. There were too many assignments (roughly twice as much compared to the last year) and the lectures were prepared poorly. |